Background. Our purpose was to investigate the role of helical tomotherapy using a simultaneous integrated boost technique for the treatment of high-grade gliomas near intracranial critical structures. Methods and materials. Of 27 patients treated with helical tomotherapy, 11 were eligible. Only patients whose tumors were within 0.5 cm of the optic chiasm, the optic nerve or the brainstem were included. The therapeutic approach was a simultaneous integrated boost, prescribing 66 and 60 Gy to the PTV1 and PTV2, respectively, in 30 fractions. All patients received concomitant temozolomide at a dose of 75 mg/m2 daily during radiation therapy. Results. Of the 11 patients considered, 3 patients (27%) died after 4 months from the completion of the combined treatment. Three patients (27%) presented local progression, and the median time to disease progression was 6 months (range, 1-12). Five patients (45%), at the time of this evaluation, did not have signs or symptoms of recurrence or progression of the disease. Acute toxicity, evaluated during radiochemotherapy, was minimal, with all patients experiencing RTOG grade 0 and grade 1 toxicity. Conclusions. Helical tomotherapy proved to be an effective and safe treatment modality, with an improvement of accuracy in delivery of highdose radiotherapy despite the presence of nearby critical structures

Donato, V., Caruso, C., Bressi, C., Pressello, M.c., Salvati, M., Delitala, A., et al. (2012). Evaluation of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of high-grade gliomas near critical structures. TUMORI, 98(5), 636-642 [10.1700/1190.13206].

Evaluation of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of high-grade gliomas near critical structures

Caruso, C.;Salvati, M.;
2012-01-01

Abstract

Background. Our purpose was to investigate the role of helical tomotherapy using a simultaneous integrated boost technique for the treatment of high-grade gliomas near intracranial critical structures. Methods and materials. Of 27 patients treated with helical tomotherapy, 11 were eligible. Only patients whose tumors were within 0.5 cm of the optic chiasm, the optic nerve or the brainstem were included. The therapeutic approach was a simultaneous integrated boost, prescribing 66 and 60 Gy to the PTV1 and PTV2, respectively, in 30 fractions. All patients received concomitant temozolomide at a dose of 75 mg/m2 daily during radiation therapy. Results. Of the 11 patients considered, 3 patients (27%) died after 4 months from the completion of the combined treatment. Three patients (27%) presented local progression, and the median time to disease progression was 6 months (range, 1-12). Five patients (45%), at the time of this evaluation, did not have signs or symptoms of recurrence or progression of the disease. Acute toxicity, evaluated during radiochemotherapy, was minimal, with all patients experiencing RTOG grade 0 and grade 1 toxicity. Conclusions. Helical tomotherapy proved to be an effective and safe treatment modality, with an improvement of accuracy in delivery of highdose radiotherapy despite the presence of nearby critical structures
2012
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-15/A - Neurochirurgia
English
Critical structures
Helical tomotherapy
High-grade gliomas
Donato, V., Caruso, C., Bressi, C., Pressello, M.c., Salvati, M., Delitala, A., et al. (2012). Evaluation of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of high-grade gliomas near critical structures. TUMORI, 98(5), 636-642 [10.1700/1190.13206].
Donato, V; Caruso, C; Bressi, C; Pressello, Mc; Salvati, M; Delitala, A; Delfini, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
01.cad.0000224446.31577.df (1).pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 98.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
98.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/413478
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact