Most of the ads displayed by digital publishers are sold via intermediaries, which have large market power and reportedly allocate the ads in an opaque way. We study the incentives of an intermediary to disclose consumer information to advertisers when auctioning ad impressions. In turn, we study how disclosure affects the incentives of publishers to outsource the sale of their ads to an intermediary and relate these incentives to the extent of consumer multihoming, the competitiveness of advertising markets, and the ability of platforms to profile consumers. We show that disclosing information that enables advertisers to optimize the allocation of ads on multihoming consumers is profitable to the intermediary only if advertising markets are sufficiently thick. When markets are thin, retaining information on consumers’ type is superior to retaining information on exposure to ads. Even though consumers multihome, the publishers may be worse off by outsourcing to the intermediary, in particular if they operate in thin advertising markets. Finally, we study how the intermediary responds to policies designed to enhance transparency and consumer privacy, and the implications of these policies for the online advertising market.
D'Annunzio, A., Russo, A. (2024). Intermediaries in the Online Advertising Market. MARKETING SCIENCE, 43(1), 33-53 [10.1287/mksc.2023.1435].
Intermediaries in the Online Advertising Market
Anna D'Annunzio
;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Most of the ads displayed by digital publishers are sold via intermediaries, which have large market power and reportedly allocate the ads in an opaque way. We study the incentives of an intermediary to disclose consumer information to advertisers when auctioning ad impressions. In turn, we study how disclosure affects the incentives of publishers to outsource the sale of their ads to an intermediary and relate these incentives to the extent of consumer multihoming, the competitiveness of advertising markets, and the ability of platforms to profile consumers. We show that disclosing information that enables advertisers to optimize the allocation of ads on multihoming consumers is profitable to the intermediary only if advertising markets are sufficiently thick. When markets are thin, retaining information on consumers’ type is superior to retaining information on exposure to ads. Even though consumers multihome, the publishers may be worse off by outsourcing to the intermediary, in particular if they operate in thin advertising markets. Finally, we study how the intermediary responds to policies designed to enhance transparency and consumer privacy, and the implications of these policies for the online advertising market.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
DAnnunzio_Russo_MktSc_2023.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
2.8 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.8 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.