A change in the method of estimating the Higgs boson width uncertainty was made towards the end of the internal review process. The plots, in particular Fig. 7a of the paper, were updated correctly to reflect this. However, the results given in the text were not updated, and as written are inconsistent with the results shown in the figure. Thus, the reported value of the Higgs boson width [Formula presented] was [Formula presented] MeV while it should have been [Formula presented] MeV. The reported observed (expected) value of the upper limit on [Formula presented] was 2.6 (2.7) when it should have been 2.5 (2.6). And the reported observed (expected) value of the upper limit on [Formula presented] was 10.5 (10.9) MeV while it should have been 10.2 (10.6) MeV.
Atlas, C., Aielli, G., Camarri, P., Cerrito, L., De Sanctis, U., Di Ciaccio, A., et al. (2024). Corrigendum to “Evidence of off-shell Higgs boson production from ZZ leptonic decay channels and constraints on its total width with the ATLAS detector” [Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138223]. PHYSICS LETTERS. SECTION B, 854 [10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138734].
Corrigendum to “Evidence of off-shell Higgs boson production from ZZ leptonic decay channels and constraints on its total width with the ATLAS detector” [Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138223]
Aielli G.
;Camarri P.
;Cerrito L.
;De Sanctis U.
;Di Ciaccio A.
;Giuli F.
2024-01-01
Abstract
A change in the method of estimating the Higgs boson width uncertainty was made towards the end of the internal review process. The plots, in particular Fig. 7a of the paper, were updated correctly to reflect this. However, the results given in the text were not updated, and as written are inconsistent with the results shown in the figure. Thus, the reported value of the Higgs boson width [Formula presented] was [Formula presented] MeV while it should have been [Formula presented] MeV. The reported observed (expected) value of the upper limit on [Formula presented] was 2.6 (2.7) when it should have been 2.5 (2.6). And the reported observed (expected) value of the upper limit on [Formula presented] was 10.5 (10.9) MeV while it should have been 10.2 (10.6) MeV.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
plb.854.138734.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
214.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
214.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
