Background: Antithrombotic therapy (AT) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has the purpose of preventing device related thrombosis (DRT), avoiding embolic events; nevertheless, the correct antithrombotic regimen after LAAO is still under debate. Aims: Aim of this substudy of the observational LOGIC registry was to describe the efficacy and safety of a light antithrombotic regimen, comprising single antiplatelet therapy or none, compared to a standard antithrombotic regimen, after a successful LAAO. Methods: Patients with NVAF that underwent LAAO were previously included in the LOGIC registry. Patients receiving single or no AT were considered as light therapy group, while other regimen were considered as standard regimen group. Outcomes of interest were death from any causes and cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack and systemic embolization, any bleeding and major bleeding at 12 months. Results: Six hundred and twenty-eight patients were considered in the analysis, 31.4 % received a light antithrombotic regimen. There were no differences in overall and cardiovascular mortality (5.1 % Vs 6.7 %, p = 0.426 and 2.0 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.553 respectively). Cerebrovascular stroke and transient ischemic attack were similar between the two groups (1.5 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.898 and 1.5 % Vs 1.3 %, p = 0.847). Light regimen was not associated with an increased rate of systemic embolism (1.0 % Vs 0.7 %, p = 0.447 and HR 0.88 [95 % CI: 0.34–2.27; p = 0.79]). A light AT regimen did not affect bleeding events being not different between the two groups (HR 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.33–1.59; p = 0.41). Conclusions: An AT regimen based on single or no antithrombotic therapy after LAAO seems to be safe in patients with high-bleeding risk, without increasing cerebrovascular or peripheral ischemic events.

Gallo, F., D'Addazio, M., D'Amico, G., Della Rocca, D.g., Mazzone, P., Bordignon, S., et al. (2025). Safety and efficacy of a light antithrombotic regimen after left atrial appendage occlusion: insights from the LOGIC (Left atrial appendage Occlusion in patients with Gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) International Multicenter Registry. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE [10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.002].

Safety and efficacy of a light antithrombotic regimen after left atrial appendage occlusion: insights from the LOGIC (Left atrial appendage Occlusion in patients with Gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) International Multicenter Registry

Natale, Andrea;
2025-01-09

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic therapy (AT) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has the purpose of preventing device related thrombosis (DRT), avoiding embolic events; nevertheless, the correct antithrombotic regimen after LAAO is still under debate. Aims: Aim of this substudy of the observational LOGIC registry was to describe the efficacy and safety of a light antithrombotic regimen, comprising single antiplatelet therapy or none, compared to a standard antithrombotic regimen, after a successful LAAO. Methods: Patients with NVAF that underwent LAAO were previously included in the LOGIC registry. Patients receiving single or no AT were considered as light therapy group, while other regimen were considered as standard regimen group. Outcomes of interest were death from any causes and cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack and systemic embolization, any bleeding and major bleeding at 12 months. Results: Six hundred and twenty-eight patients were considered in the analysis, 31.4 % received a light antithrombotic regimen. There were no differences in overall and cardiovascular mortality (5.1 % Vs 6.7 %, p = 0.426 and 2.0 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.553 respectively). Cerebrovascular stroke and transient ischemic attack were similar between the two groups (1.5 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.898 and 1.5 % Vs 1.3 %, p = 0.847). Light regimen was not associated with an increased rate of systemic embolism (1.0 % Vs 0.7 %, p = 0.447 and HR 0.88 [95 % CI: 0.34–2.27; p = 0.79]). A light AT regimen did not affect bleeding events being not different between the two groups (HR 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.33–1.59; p = 0.41). Conclusions: An AT regimen based on single or no antithrombotic therapy after LAAO seems to be safe in patients with high-bleeding risk, without increasing cerebrovascular or peripheral ischemic events.
9-gen-2025
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-13/C - Chirurgia cardiaca
English
Anticoagulants
Antithrombotic therapy
Cardioembolic stroke
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Gallo, F., D'Addazio, M., D'Amico, G., Della Rocca, D.g., Mazzone, P., Bordignon, S., et al. (2025). Safety and efficacy of a light antithrombotic regimen after left atrial appendage occlusion: insights from the LOGIC (Left atrial appendage Occlusion in patients with Gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) International Multicenter Registry. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE [10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.002].
Gallo, F; D'Addazio, M; D'Amico, G; Della Rocca, Dg; Mazzone, P; Bordignon, S; Casu, G; Giannini, F; Berti, S; Horton, Rp; D'Angelo, G; Urbanek, L; Me...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Natale.15.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 906.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
906.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/402904
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact