Upper and lower acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The latest computerized tomography (CT) imaging techniques play an important role in the treatment of this pathology. Twenty-nine patients with severe AGIB (11 upper, 18 lower), all hemodynamically stable, underwent endoscopy followed by a multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scan. Endoscopic and MDCT accuracy for the anatomical localization and etiology of AGIB was assessed, the diagnosis being considered correct when the two procedures were concordant or when the diagnosis was confirmed by angiographic, surgical, or post-mortem findings. The sensitivity in identifying the site and etiology of bleeding was, respectively, 100% and 90.9% for the MDCT scan, compared with 72.7% and 54.5% for endoscopy in upper AGIB, and 100% and 88.2% for the MDCT scan, compared with 52.9% and 52.9% for endoscopy, in lower AGIB. Considering the advantages of MDCT over endoscopy, we propose a new diagnostic algorithm for AGIB. © 2009 Société Internationale de Chirurgie.

Frattaroli, F., Casciani, E., Spoletini, D., Polettini, E., Nunziale, A., Bertini, L., et al. (2009). Prospective study comparing multi-detector row CT and endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 33(10), 2209-2217 [10.1007/s00268-009-0156-6].

Prospective study comparing multi-detector row CT and endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Casciani E;
2009-10-01

Abstract

Upper and lower acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The latest computerized tomography (CT) imaging techniques play an important role in the treatment of this pathology. Twenty-nine patients with severe AGIB (11 upper, 18 lower), all hemodynamically stable, underwent endoscopy followed by a multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scan. Endoscopic and MDCT accuracy for the anatomical localization and etiology of AGIB was assessed, the diagnosis being considered correct when the two procedures were concordant or when the diagnosis was confirmed by angiographic, surgical, or post-mortem findings. The sensitivity in identifying the site and etiology of bleeding was, respectively, 100% and 90.9% for the MDCT scan, compared with 72.7% and 54.5% for endoscopy in upper AGIB, and 100% and 88.2% for the MDCT scan, compared with 52.9% and 52.9% for endoscopy, in lower AGIB. Considering the advantages of MDCT over endoscopy, we propose a new diagnostic algorithm for AGIB. © 2009 Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
ott-2009
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/23
Settore MEDS-22/A - Diagnostica per immagini e radioterapia
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Frattaroli, F., Casciani, E., Spoletini, D., Polettini, E., Nunziale, A., Bertini, L., et al. (2009). Prospective study comparing multi-detector row CT and endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 33(10), 2209-2217 [10.1007/s00268-009-0156-6].
Frattaroli, F; Casciani, E; Spoletini, D; Polettini, E; Nunziale, A; Bertini, L; Vestri, A; Gualdi, G; Pappalardo, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
tc sanguinamento gastrointestinale.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 4.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.94 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/402565
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 62
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact