Purpose:The Manta Vascular Closure Device is a novel collagen-based vascular closure device that has been designed specifically for closure of large-bore percutaneous arterial accesses. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the immediate and 30-day outcome of Manta at the completion of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The hypothesis is that Manta is not inferior in obtaining hemostasis compared with the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System device. Materials and Methods:We recruited all the percutaneous accesses for (T)EVAR performed from January 2021 to April 2023 by all the Italian Divisions of Vascular Surgery using Manta at the time of data collection (May 2023). The primary outcome is to evaluate the incidence of complications at the puncture site after Manta implantation and at 1 month, and compare this with ProGlide. We applied the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria for observational studies. Results:Overall, 524 consecutive femoral accesses for (T)EVAR procedures were collected: 355 in the Manta cohort and 169 in the ProGlide cohort, respectively. The size of the sheath was 17.2±2.7 Fr for Manta, 15.7±2.3 Fr for ProGlide (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, ultrasound-guided access, femoral calcifications, intraoperative, and 30-day complications. Successful arterial closure at groin puncture sites for (T)EVAR using Manta is 90.5% and 93.1% using ProGlide. Freedom for any reintervention for any complication is 95.5% for Manta and 96% for ProGlide. Conclusion:The 2 vascular closure devices have proved to be similar in terms of complications, without any statistically significant difference, although the median size of the sheaths for (T)EVAR was statistically significantly larger when Manta has been used, compared with ProGlide.

Panagrosso, M., Cavallo, E., Bracale, U., Peluso, A., Intrieri, F., Molinari, V., et al. (2024). Collagen-based vascular closure device multicenter Italian experience in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair compared to suture-mediated closure vascular device. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY [10.1177/15266028241275804].

Collagen-based vascular closure device multicenter Italian experience in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair compared to suture-mediated closure vascular device

Martelli Eugenio
2024-01-01

Abstract

Purpose:The Manta Vascular Closure Device is a novel collagen-based vascular closure device that has been designed specifically for closure of large-bore percutaneous arterial accesses. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the immediate and 30-day outcome of Manta at the completion of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The hypothesis is that Manta is not inferior in obtaining hemostasis compared with the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System device. Materials and Methods:We recruited all the percutaneous accesses for (T)EVAR performed from January 2021 to April 2023 by all the Italian Divisions of Vascular Surgery using Manta at the time of data collection (May 2023). The primary outcome is to evaluate the incidence of complications at the puncture site after Manta implantation and at 1 month, and compare this with ProGlide. We applied the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria for observational studies. Results:Overall, 524 consecutive femoral accesses for (T)EVAR procedures were collected: 355 in the Manta cohort and 169 in the ProGlide cohort, respectively. The size of the sheath was 17.2±2.7 Fr for Manta, 15.7±2.3 Fr for ProGlide (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, ultrasound-guided access, femoral calcifications, intraoperative, and 30-day complications. Successful arterial closure at groin puncture sites for (T)EVAR using Manta is 90.5% and 93.1% using ProGlide. Freedom for any reintervention for any complication is 95.5% for Manta and 96% for ProGlide. Conclusion:The 2 vascular closure devices have proved to be similar in terms of complications, without any statistically significant difference, although the median size of the sheaths for (T)EVAR was statistically significantly larger when Manta has been used, compared with ProGlide.
2024
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-13/B - Chirurgia vascolare
English
EVAR
Vascular Closure Device
Panagrosso, M., Cavallo, E., Bracale, U., Peluso, A., Intrieri, F., Molinari, V., et al. (2024). Collagen-based vascular closure device multicenter Italian experience in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair compared to suture-mediated closure vascular device. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY [10.1177/15266028241275804].
Panagrosso, M; Cavallo, E; Bracale, U; Peluso, Aso; Intrieri, F; Molinari, V; Md, ; Esposito, A; Trimarchi, S; Settembrini, A; Lomazzi, C; La Barbera,...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
panagrosso-et-al-2024-collagen-based-vascular-closure-device-multicenter-italian-experience-in-endovascular-aortic.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 689.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
689.56 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/399272
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact