The criticism of current law aimed the limits of a owner-centric vision, in the sense that it places private property (as ius abutendi and ius excludendi) as a central legal scheme in the forms of belonging in contemporaneity. The historiography reconstruction has been oriented to grasp in terms of development and derivation the idea of dominium from the powers of the pater familias (or from one of them). Instead, a line of discontinuity is highlighted that will open new interpretative lines.
Cardilli, R. (2024). Poteri del pater familias e dominium: storia di una discontinuità. LEGAL ROOTS, 13, 565-606.
Poteri del pater familias e dominium: storia di una discontinuità
Cardilli, R
2024-01-01
Abstract
The criticism of current law aimed the limits of a owner-centric vision, in the sense that it places private property (as ius abutendi and ius excludendi) as a central legal scheme in the forms of belonging in contemporaneity. The historiography reconstruction has been oriented to grasp in terms of development and derivation the idea of dominium from the powers of the pater familias (or from one of them). Instead, a line of discontinuity is highlighted that will open new interpretative lines.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ELR-25_Cardilli.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
436.26 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
436.26 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.