background: both balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves for tran-scatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are broadly used in clinical practice. However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials comparing these two valve designs are lacking. methods: The CENTER-study included 12,381 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. patients undergoing TAVI with a BE-valve (n = 4096) were compared to patients undergoing TAVI with an SE-valve (n = 4096) after propensity score matching. clinical outcomes including one-year mortality and stroke rates were assessed. results: In the matched population of n = 5410 patients, the mean age was 81 ± 3 years, 60% was female, and the STS-PROM predicted 30-day mortality was 6.2% (IQR 4.0–12.4). one-year mortality was not different between patients treated with BE-or SE-valves (BE: 16.4% vs. SE: 17.0%, relative risk 1.04, 95%CI 0.02–1.21, p = 0.57). one-year stroke rates were also comparable (BE: 4.9% vs. SE: 5.3%, RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.86–1.37, p = 0.48). conclusion: this study suggests that one-year mortality and stroke rates were comparable in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVI with either BE or SE-valves.

van Nieuwkerk, A.c., Santos, R.b., Andraka, L., Tchetche, D., de Brito, F.s., Barbanti, M., et al. (2021). Balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Complications and outcomes from a large international patient cohort. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 10(17), 4005 [10.3390/jcm10174005].

Balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Complications and outcomes from a large international patient cohort

D'onofrio A.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

background: both balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves for tran-scatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are broadly used in clinical practice. However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials comparing these two valve designs are lacking. methods: The CENTER-study included 12,381 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. patients undergoing TAVI with a BE-valve (n = 4096) were compared to patients undergoing TAVI with an SE-valve (n = 4096) after propensity score matching. clinical outcomes including one-year mortality and stroke rates were assessed. results: In the matched population of n = 5410 patients, the mean age was 81 ± 3 years, 60% was female, and the STS-PROM predicted 30-day mortality was 6.2% (IQR 4.0–12.4). one-year mortality was not different between patients treated with BE-or SE-valves (BE: 16.4% vs. SE: 17.0%, relative risk 1.04, 95%CI 0.02–1.21, p = 0.57). one-year stroke rates were also comparable (BE: 4.9% vs. SE: 5.3%, RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.86–1.37, p = 0.48). conclusion: this study suggests that one-year mortality and stroke rates were comparable in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVI with either BE or SE-valves.
2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Comitato scientifico
Settore MED/23
Settore MEDS-13/C - Chirurgia cardiaca
English
Aortic valve stenosis
Balloon-expandable
Mortality
Self-expandable
Stroke
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
van Nieuwkerk, A.c., Santos, R.b., Andraka, L., Tchetche, D., de Brito, F.s., Barbanti, M., et al. (2021). Balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Complications and outcomes from a large international patient cohort. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 10(17), 4005 [10.3390/jcm10174005].
van Nieuwkerk, Ac; Santos, Rb; Andraka, L; Tchetche, D; de Brito, Fs; Barbanti, M; Kornowski, R; Latib, A; D'Onofrio, A; Ribichini, F; Ten, F; Dumonte...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-10-04005.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 811.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
811.29 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/397122
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact