The mandatory shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic has made employers and employees increasingly aware of the productivity benefits that may arise from the digital revolution. To explore the characteristics of these gains, we build a model that enables companies to choose from three types of relationship inputs: face-to-face, remote synchronous, and remote asynchronous. Once remote interactions are included, five factors influencing job satisfaction and therefore worker productivity can be identified: (i) reduced mobility, (ii) interaction frequency, (iii) optimal time/place, (iv) work-life balance, and (v) relationship decay effects. We compute the optimal distribution of the three relationship types that maximize corporate profits, conditioning on reasonable parametric assumptions on these five effects. Additionally, we evaluate the potential productivity growth for companies employing only face-to-face interactions when introducing remote interactions. We test our theoretical predictions with a Structural Equation Model, revealing that remote work enhances worker satisfaction and willingness to contribute additional effort at the same wage. Our empirical findings have relevant implications for industrial and environmental policies at both national and supranational levels.

Becchetti, L., Salustri, F., Solferino, N. (2024). The new industrial revolution: the optimal choice for flexible work companies. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTERACTION AND COORDINATION [10.1007/s11403-024-00418-y].

The new industrial revolution: the optimal choice for flexible work companies

Becchetti L.;Salustri F.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

The mandatory shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic has made employers and employees increasingly aware of the productivity benefits that may arise from the digital revolution. To explore the characteristics of these gains, we build a model that enables companies to choose from three types of relationship inputs: face-to-face, remote synchronous, and remote asynchronous. Once remote interactions are included, five factors influencing job satisfaction and therefore worker productivity can be identified: (i) reduced mobility, (ii) interaction frequency, (iii) optimal time/place, (iv) work-life balance, and (v) relationship decay effects. We compute the optimal distribution of the three relationship types that maximize corporate profits, conditioning on reasonable parametric assumptions on these five effects. Additionally, we evaluate the potential productivity growth for companies employing only face-to-face interactions when introducing remote interactions. We test our theoretical predictions with a Structural Equation Model, revealing that remote work enhances worker satisfaction and willingness to contribute additional effort at the same wage. Our empirical findings have relevant implications for industrial and environmental policies at both national and supranational levels.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore ECON-01/A - Economia politica
English
Flexible work
Remote work
Digital relationship
Productivity
Structural equation model
J24
O30
Becchetti, L., Salustri, F., Solferino, N. (2024). The new industrial revolution: the optimal choice for flexible work companies. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTERACTION AND COORDINATION [10.1007/s11403-024-00418-y].
Becchetti, L; Salustri, F; Solferino, N
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JEIC paper Becchetti.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: paper completo
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 1.34 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.34 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
abstract.docx

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 12.76 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
12.76 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/396777
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact