Evaluating Treatment Outcomes for Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures: A Systematic Review

background: pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) are typical in geriatric populations with reduced bone quality, most commonly in elderly postmenopausal women. these fractures are usually caused by low-energy forces over the bones during ordinary life and cause disabling pain. treatment options range from conservative to operative. the aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of treatments for pelvic insufficiency fractures, determining optimal approaches between surgical intervention and conservative management. methods: this literature review systematically examines articles focusing on patients with PIF, following the peferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and using pubmed, medline, and the cochrane library database. we took into account only full-text articles in indexed journals with available english abstracts, considering data about patient demographics, surgery, and outcomes. results: after screening 128 articles, this study reviewed 20 manuscripts involving 1499 patients, mostly elderly females and focusing on sacrum fractures. common treatments included conservative methods and sacroplasty, with a few complications reported. osteoporosis was the prevalent comorbidity, and the survival rate post-treatment was high at 92.3%. mobility outcomes varied, with some patients experiencing significant autonomy loss. the average follow-up period was over 17 months. conclusions: this study found a cautious approach to surgery (timing of three weeks), which is reserved only for specific patterns, and it leads to increased autonomy and a lower risk of mortality. due to the lack of pre- and postoperative scores as well as conflicting results, it is imperative to undertake further studies and research to be able to compare the alternative treatments efficiently.