Proper evaluation of seismic-induced excess pore water pressures in saturated sandy soils is still an open issue, which can be tackled with fully coupled to uncoupled approaches. The former are more accurate but computationally onerous, while the latter require seismic demand and pore pressure build-up to be computed in two successive steps, typically employing simple constitutive assumptions. Starting from the work by Seed et al. (1975), this paper presents a novel uncoupled procedure to compute excess water pressures developing in a 1D soil column under partially drained conditions, when subjected to horizontal seismic excitations. Fundamental modifications are introduced to account for: non-uniform distribution of equivalent loading cycles; soil stiffness degradation; and modification of the frequency content of ground motion due to pore pressure build-up. The approach was implemented in Matlab via the Finite Difference Method and validated against both fullycoupled Finite Element analyses and one centrifuge test. An extensive parametric study was also performed for a two-layer soil column, by varying the thickness and hydraulic conductivity of the shallow layer, as well as the seismic input. The good agreement with both numerical and experimental data demonstrates that key features of liquefaction are well-captured by the proposed uncoupled approach.

Boccieri, G., Gaudio, D., Conti, R. (2024). An uncoupled approach for estimating seismic-induced pore water pressures in liquefiable sandy soils. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 170 [10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106266].

An uncoupled approach for estimating seismic-induced pore water pressures in liquefiable sandy soils

Boccieri G.;Conti R.
2024-01-01

Abstract

Proper evaluation of seismic-induced excess pore water pressures in saturated sandy soils is still an open issue, which can be tackled with fully coupled to uncoupled approaches. The former are more accurate but computationally onerous, while the latter require seismic demand and pore pressure build-up to be computed in two successive steps, typically employing simple constitutive assumptions. Starting from the work by Seed et al. (1975), this paper presents a novel uncoupled procedure to compute excess water pressures developing in a 1D soil column under partially drained conditions, when subjected to horizontal seismic excitations. Fundamental modifications are introduced to account for: non-uniform distribution of equivalent loading cycles; soil stiffness degradation; and modification of the frequency content of ground motion due to pore pressure build-up. The approach was implemented in Matlab via the Finite Difference Method and validated against both fullycoupled Finite Element analyses and one centrifuge test. An extensive parametric study was also performed for a two-layer soil column, by varying the thickness and hydraulic conductivity of the shallow layer, as well as the seismic input. The good agreement with both numerical and experimental data demonstrates that key features of liquefaction are well-captured by the proposed uncoupled approach.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore CEAR-05/A - Geotecnica
English
Excess pore water pressure; Liquefaction; Number of equivalent cycles; Uncoupled approach; Numerical analyses; Earthquake
Boccieri, G., Gaudio, D., Conti, R. (2024). An uncoupled approach for estimating seismic-induced pore water pressures in liquefiable sandy soils. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 170 [10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106266].
Boccieri, G; Gaudio, D; Conti, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024_Boccieri_etal.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 4.77 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.77 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/394401
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact