Measuring Nurses’ Organizational Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Available Instruments

this systematic review aimed to identify and compare instruments measuring nurses' organizational well-being, summarise the dimensions measured by these instruments, the statistical analysis performed for validity evidence and identify an instrument that comprehensively investigates nurses' organizational well-being. the JBI manual for evidence synthesis and the PRISMA checklist were used as guidelines. the search was conducted on medline, CINAHL, cochrane library and scopus. critical appraisal and data extraction were drawn on the COSMIN checklist. dimensions were conceptually synthesized by the measurement concepts' similarity. twenty-two articles were retrieved and they included 21 instruments that measured nurses' organizational well-being. the instruments vary by dimension number (range 2-19), items (range 12-118) and concept elicitation. a plurality of methodologies has been used in instrument development and assessments of evidence for validity. only four instruments reported a concurrent criterion validity or a measurement comparison with an already tested-for-validity instrument. similar dimensions were leadership and support, relationships and communication, work-family balance, work demands, violence, control and autonomy, satisfaction and motivation, work environment and resources, careers, and organizational policy. this review underlines the core areas of the instruments that measure nursing organizational well-being. It allows administrators and researchers to choose the appropriate instruments for monitoring this multidimensional concept.