We perform a laboratory test of Pledge-and-Review bargaining, implementing a simplified version of the model analysed in Harstad (2021a). In theory, this institution should increase contributions to a public good only if there is uncertainty over the value of possible future payoffs. In contrast, we find that Pledge-and-Review increases efficiency in all the settings we investigate, and that the improvement is most persistent in our setting without uncertainty. Our results suggest that the Pledge-and-Review institution may be useful, even without uncertainty, as it allows conditional cooperators to test, risk free, the cooperativeness of their partners. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Lippert, S., Tremewan, J. (2021). Pledge-and-review in the laboratory. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 130, 179-195 [10.1016/j.geb.2021.08.003].
Pledge-and-review in the laboratory
Tremewan, J.
2021-01-01
Abstract
We perform a laboratory test of Pledge-and-Review bargaining, implementing a simplified version of the model analysed in Harstad (2021a). In theory, this institution should increase contributions to a public good only if there is uncertainty over the value of possible future payoffs. In contrast, we find that Pledge-and-Review increases efficiency in all the settings we investigate, and that the improvement is most persistent in our setting without uncertainty. Our results suggest that the Pledge-and-Review institution may be useful, even without uncertainty, as it allows conditional cooperators to test, risk free, the cooperativeness of their partners. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
LippertTremewan2021.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.99 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.99 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.