CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System

IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.

Objective: To compare the operative data and early postoperative outcome of vaginal. hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and minilaparotomy hysterectomy (MiniLPT). Methods: A total of 150 women who required hysterectomy for enlarged myomatous uteri were randomly allocated into 3 treatment groups: VH (n=50), LAVH (n=50), and MiniLPT (n=50). The primary outcome was hospital discharge time. The secondary outcomes were operative time, blood toss, paralytic ileus, postoperative pain, and intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Results: Mean hospital discharge time was longest with MiniLPT, and shortest with VH (P < 0.01). VH was the fastest operating technique, was associated with less blood loss, and resulted in shortest duration of paralytic ileus (P < 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: VH should be the preferred surgical approach in patients with enlarged myomatous uteri. When VH is not feasible, LAVH should be considered an alternative to MiniLPT. Further controlled prospective studies are required to confirm these results. (c) 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Sesti, F., Calonzi, F., Ruggeri, V., Pietropolli, A., & Piccione, E. (2008). A comparison of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal, and minilaparotomy hysterectomies for enlarged myomatous uteri. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 103(3), 227-231 [10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.07.006].

Powered by IRIS-about IRIS-Utilizzo dei cookie

 Copyright © 2021