Meditation comprises a series of practices mainly developed in eastern cultures aiming at controlling emotions and enhancing attentional processes. Several authors proposed to divide meditation techniques in focused attention (FA) and open monitoring (OM) tech- niques. Previous studies have reported differences in brain networks underlying FA and OM. On the other hand common activations across different meditative practices have been reported. Despite differences between forms of meditation and their underlying cognitive processes, we propose that all meditative techniques could share a central process that would be supported by a core network for meditation since their general common goal is to induce relaxation, regulating attention and developing an attitude of detachment from one’s own thoughts. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) of 10 neuroimaging studies (91 subjects) on different meditative techniques to evidence the core cortical network subserving med- itation. We showed activation of basal ganglia (caudate body), limbic system (enthorinal cortex) and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). We discuss the functional role of these struc- tures in meditation and we tentatively propose a neurocognitive model of meditation that could guide future research.

Sperduti, M., Martinelli, P., Piolino, P. (2012). A neurocognitive model of meditation based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 21(1), 269-276 [10.1016/J.CONCOG.2011.09.019].

A neurocognitive model of meditation based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis

Sperduti, Marco
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2012-03-01

Abstract

Meditation comprises a series of practices mainly developed in eastern cultures aiming at controlling emotions and enhancing attentional processes. Several authors proposed to divide meditation techniques in focused attention (FA) and open monitoring (OM) tech- niques. Previous studies have reported differences in brain networks underlying FA and OM. On the other hand common activations across different meditative practices have been reported. Despite differences between forms of meditation and their underlying cognitive processes, we propose that all meditative techniques could share a central process that would be supported by a core network for meditation since their general common goal is to induce relaxation, regulating attention and developing an attitude of detachment from one’s own thoughts. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) of 10 neuroimaging studies (91 subjects) on different meditative techniques to evidence the core cortical network subserving med- itation. We showed activation of basal ganglia (caudate body), limbic system (enthorinal cortex) and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). We discuss the functional role of these struc- tures in meditation and we tentatively propose a neurocognitive model of meditation that could guide future research.
mar-2012
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore PSIC-01/B - Neuropsicologia e neuroscienze cognitive
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Meditation; fMRI; PET; SPECT; Neuroimaging; Meta-analysis
Sperduti, M., Martinelli, P., Piolino, P. (2012). A neurocognitive model of meditation based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 21(1), 269-276 [10.1016/J.CONCOG.2011.09.019].
Sperduti, M; Martinelli, P; Piolino, P
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2012_CCOG.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 315.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
315.67 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/384363
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 68
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact