background: pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients show more inflammatory disease compared with adult-onset MS. However, highly effective treatments are limited with only fingolimod being approved in Italy and natalizumab prescribed as off-label treatment. objectives: to compare the efficacy of natalizumab versus fingolimod in POMS. methods: this is an observational longitudinal multicentre study including natalizumab- and fingolimod-treated POMS patients (N-POMS and F-POMS, respectively). we collected annual relapse rate (ARR), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), symbol digit modality test (SDMT), and MRI activity at baseline (T0), 12-18 months (T1), and last available observation (T2). results: we enrolled 57 N-POMS and 27 F-POMS patients from six Italian MS Centres. At T0, N-POMS patients showed higher ARR (p = 0.03), higher EDSS (p = 0.003) and lower SDMT (p = 0.04) at baseline compared with F-POMS. between T0 and T1 ARR improved for both N-POMS and F-POMS (p < 0.001), while EDSS (p < 0.001) and SDMT (p = 0.03) improved only for N-POMS. At T2 (66.1 ± 55.4 months) we collected data from 42 out of 57 N-POMS patients showing no further ARR decrease. conclusion: both natalizumab and fingolimod showed high and sustained efficacy in controlling relapses and natalizumab also associated to a disability decrease in POMS. this latter effect might be partly mediated by the high inflammatory activity at baseline in N-POMS.
Carotenuto, A., Di Monaco, C., Papetti, L., Borriello, G., Signoriello, E., Masciulli, C., et al. (2024). Pediatric-onset Multiple Sclerosis treatment: a multicentre observational study comparing natalizumab with fingolimod. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY [10.1007/s00415-024-12610-y].
Pediatric-onset Multiple Sclerosis treatment: a multicentre observational study comparing natalizumab with fingolimod
Valeriani, Massimiliano;
2024-08-23
Abstract
background: pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients show more inflammatory disease compared with adult-onset MS. However, highly effective treatments are limited with only fingolimod being approved in Italy and natalizumab prescribed as off-label treatment. objectives: to compare the efficacy of natalizumab versus fingolimod in POMS. methods: this is an observational longitudinal multicentre study including natalizumab- and fingolimod-treated POMS patients (N-POMS and F-POMS, respectively). we collected annual relapse rate (ARR), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), symbol digit modality test (SDMT), and MRI activity at baseline (T0), 12-18 months (T1), and last available observation (T2). results: we enrolled 57 N-POMS and 27 F-POMS patients from six Italian MS Centres. At T0, N-POMS patients showed higher ARR (p = 0.03), higher EDSS (p = 0.003) and lower SDMT (p = 0.04) at baseline compared with F-POMS. between T0 and T1 ARR improved for both N-POMS and F-POMS (p < 0.001), while EDSS (p < 0.001) and SDMT (p = 0.03) improved only for N-POMS. At T2 (66.1 ± 55.4 months) we collected data from 42 out of 57 N-POMS patients showing no further ARR decrease. conclusion: both natalizumab and fingolimod showed high and sustained efficacy in controlling relapses and natalizumab also associated to a disability decrease in POMS. this latter effect might be partly mediated by the high inflammatory activity at baseline in N-POMS.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
carotenuto 2024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
693.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
693.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.