The reliability of DrugWipe 5A on site test for principal drugs of abuse (cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, and opiates) detection in oral fluid was assessed by comparing the on-site results with headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis on samples extracted by the device collection pad. Oral fluid samples were collected at recreational settings (e.g., discos, pubs, and music bars) of Rome metropolitan area. Eighty-three club goers underwent the on-site drug screening test with one device. Independently from the result obtained, a second device was used just to collect another oral fluid sample subsequently extracted and analyzed in the laboratory following HS-SPME procedure, gas chromatographic separation by a capillary column, and MS detection by electron impact ionization. DrugWipe 5A on-site test showed 54 samples (65.1%) positive to one or more drugs of abuse, whereas 75 samples (90.4%) tested positive for one or more substances following GC-MS assay. Comparing the obtained results, the device showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy around 80% for amphetamines class. Sensitivity (67 and 50%) was obtained for cocaine and opiates, while both sensitivity and accuracy were unsuccessful (29 and 53%, resp.) for cannabis, underlying the limitation of the device for this latter drug class.

Gentili, S., Solimini, R., Tittarelli, R., Mannocchi, G., Paolo Busard(\`(o)), F. (2016). A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context. JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL METHODS IN CHEMISTRY, 2016, 1-10 [10.1155/2016/1234581].

A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context

Roberta Tittarelli;
2016-01-01

Abstract

The reliability of DrugWipe 5A on site test for principal drugs of abuse (cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, and opiates) detection in oral fluid was assessed by comparing the on-site results with headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis on samples extracted by the device collection pad. Oral fluid samples were collected at recreational settings (e.g., discos, pubs, and music bars) of Rome metropolitan area. Eighty-three club goers underwent the on-site drug screening test with one device. Independently from the result obtained, a second device was used just to collect another oral fluid sample subsequently extracted and analyzed in the laboratory following HS-SPME procedure, gas chromatographic separation by a capillary column, and MS detection by electron impact ionization. DrugWipe 5A on-site test showed 54 samples (65.1%) positive to one or more drugs of abuse, whereas 75 samples (90.4%) tested positive for one or more substances following GC-MS assay. Comparing the obtained results, the device showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy around 80% for amphetamines class. Sensitivity (67 and 50%) was obtained for cocaine and opiates, while both sensitivity and accuracy were unsuccessful (29 and 53%, resp.) for cannabis, underlying the limitation of the device for this latter drug class.
2016
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/43
English
Gentili, S., Solimini, R., Tittarelli, R., Mannocchi, G., Paolo Busard(\`(o)), F. (2016). A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context. JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL METHODS IN CHEMISTRY, 2016, 1-10 [10.1155/2016/1234581].
Gentili, S; Solimini, R; Tittarelli, R; Mannocchi, G; Paolo Busard(\`(o)), F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 531.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
531.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/380745
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact