objective: to provide an overview of the prevalence of nursing diagnoses in different patient populations and healthcare settings, and on the methods identifying nursing diagnoses. methods: a descriptive review with a systematic method was applied according to preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. aal studies, in medline and CINAHL databases from January 2007 to January 2020, reporting nursing diagnoses prevalence were included regardless of population and setting retrieving 1839 articles. results: after the screening, 328 articles were included for the analysis. twenty different patient populations with their respective nursing diagnoses prevalence were identified. most studies were conducted in inpatient settings (e.g., intensive, and surgical units). NANDA International was a widespread standard nursing language used, and risk for infection was the most frequently identified nursing diagnosis. Several gaps were identified regarding the methods used in the articles analyzed. conclusion: the most prevalent nursing diagnoses in different patient populations were identified. moreover, the nursing diagnoses in the five standard nursing languages recognized by the american nurses association were summarized. advances, gaps, and a call to action were identified.

D'Agostino, F., Tuinman, A., Takáo Lopes, C., Leoni-Scheiber, C., Widmann, M., Barrientos-Trigo, S., et al. (2024). A review of nursing diagnoses prevalence in different populations and healthcare settings. ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 37 [10.37689/acta-ape/2024ar0011733].

A review of nursing diagnoses prevalence in different populations and healthcare settings

Valentina Zeffiro
2024-01-01

Abstract

objective: to provide an overview of the prevalence of nursing diagnoses in different patient populations and healthcare settings, and on the methods identifying nursing diagnoses. methods: a descriptive review with a systematic method was applied according to preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. aal studies, in medline and CINAHL databases from January 2007 to January 2020, reporting nursing diagnoses prevalence were included regardless of population and setting retrieving 1839 articles. results: after the screening, 328 articles were included for the analysis. twenty different patient populations with their respective nursing diagnoses prevalence were identified. most studies were conducted in inpatient settings (e.g., intensive, and surgical units). NANDA International was a widespread standard nursing language used, and risk for infection was the most frequently identified nursing diagnosis. Several gaps were identified regarding the methods used in the articles analyzed. conclusion: the most prevalent nursing diagnoses in different patient populations were identified. moreover, the nursing diagnoses in the five standard nursing languages recognized by the american nurses association were summarized. advances, gaps, and a call to action were identified.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Review
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/45
English
Nursing diagnosis
Prevalence
Standardized nursing terminology
D'Agostino, F., Tuinman, A., Takáo Lopes, C., Leoni-Scheiber, C., Widmann, M., Barrientos-Trigo, S., et al. (2024). A review of nursing diagnoses prevalence in different populations and healthcare settings. ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 37 [10.37689/acta-ape/2024ar0011733].
D'Agostino, F; Tuinman, A; Takáo Lopes, C; Leoni-Scheiber, C; Widmann, M; Barrientos-Trigo, S; Batista-Santos, V; Zeffiro, V
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
review of nursing diagnoses prevalence_acta.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.83 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/378104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact