in pediatric patients, the choice of the venous access device currently relies upon the operator's experience and preference and on the local availability of specific resources and technologies. though, considering the limited options for venous access in children if compared to adults, such clinical choice has a great critical relevance and should preferably be based on the best available evidence. though some algorithms have been published over the last 5 years, none of them seems fully satisfactory and useful in clinical practice. thus, the GAVePed-which is the pediatric interest group of the most important Italian group on venous access, GAVeCeLT-has developed a national consensus about the choice of the venous access device in children. after a systematic review of the available evidence, the panel of the consensus (which included Italian experts with documented competence in this area) has provided structured recommendations answering 10 key questions regarding the choice of venous access both in emergency and in elective situations, both in the hospitalized and in the non-hospitalized child. only statements reaching a complete agreement were included in the final recommendations. all recommendations were also structured as a simple visual algorithm, so as to be easily translated into clinical practice.

Pittiruti, M., Crocoli, A., Zanaboni, C., Annetta, M.g., Bevilacqua, M., Biasucci, D.g., et al. (2024). The pediatric DAV-expert algorithm: A GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access device in children. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS [10.1177/11297298241256999].

The pediatric DAV-expert algorithm: A GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access device in children

Biasucci, Daniele G
Validation
;
2024-06-10

Abstract

in pediatric patients, the choice of the venous access device currently relies upon the operator's experience and preference and on the local availability of specific resources and technologies. though, considering the limited options for venous access in children if compared to adults, such clinical choice has a great critical relevance and should preferably be based on the best available evidence. though some algorithms have been published over the last 5 years, none of them seems fully satisfactory and useful in clinical practice. thus, the GAVePed-which is the pediatric interest group of the most important Italian group on venous access, GAVeCeLT-has developed a national consensus about the choice of the venous access device in children. after a systematic review of the available evidence, the panel of the consensus (which included Italian experts with documented competence in this area) has provided structured recommendations answering 10 key questions regarding the choice of venous access both in emergency and in elective situations, both in the hospitalized and in the non-hospitalized child. only statements reaching a complete agreement were included in the final recommendations. all recommendations were also structured as a simple visual algorithm, so as to be easily translated into clinical practice.
10-giu-2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/41
English
PICC
Pediatric
algorithm
central venous catheterization
decision making
midline catheters
ultrasound
vascular access
venous access
Pittiruti, M., Crocoli, A., Zanaboni, C., Annetta, M.g., Bevilacqua, M., Biasucci, D.g., et al. (2024). The pediatric DAV-expert algorithm: A GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access device in children. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS [10.1177/11297298241256999].
Pittiruti, M; Crocoli, A; Zanaboni, C; Annetta, Mg; Bevilacqua, M; Biasucci, Dg; Celentano, D; Cesaro, S; Chiaretti, A; Disma, N; Mancino, A; Martucci...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pittiruti-et-al-2024-the-pediatric-dav-expert-algorithm-a-gavecelt-gaveped-consensus-for-the-choice-of-the-most-2.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 524.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
524.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/372926
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact