our study aimed at investigating the nociceptive contribution to the somatosensory evoked potentials after electrical intramuscular stimulation (mSEPs) at painful intensity. scalp mSEPs were recorded in 10 healthy subjects after electrical stimulation of the left brachioradialis muscle at three intensities: non-painful (I2), slightly painful (I4) and moderately painful (I6). for each intensity, mSEPs were recorded in a neutral condition (NC) in which subjects did not have any task, and in an attention condition (AC) in which subjects were asked to count the number of stimuli. In both NC and AC, the N120 and P220 amplitudes were significantly higher at I6 than at I2. while the NI 20 amplitude did not vary between NC and AC, the P220 amplitude was significantly higher in AC than in NC at all stimulus intensities. our results suggest that nociceptive inputs contribute to the N120 amplitude increase at painful stimulus intensity, while the P220 amplitude is more sensitive to changes of subjects' attention level. therefore, the N120 amplitude increase to moderately painful stimuli, as compared to non-painful stimuli, may represent a marker of the activation of the muscular thin myelinated afferents.

Valeriani, M., Tonali, P., De Armas, L., Mariani, S., Vigevano, F., Le Pera, D. (2008). Nociceptive contribution to the evoked potentials after painful intramuscular electrical stimulation. NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 60(2), 170-175 [10.1016/j.neures.2007.10.008].

Nociceptive contribution to the evoked potentials after painful intramuscular electrical stimulation

Valeriani, Massimiliano;Mariani, Simona;
2008-02-01

Abstract

our study aimed at investigating the nociceptive contribution to the somatosensory evoked potentials after electrical intramuscular stimulation (mSEPs) at painful intensity. scalp mSEPs were recorded in 10 healthy subjects after electrical stimulation of the left brachioradialis muscle at three intensities: non-painful (I2), slightly painful (I4) and moderately painful (I6). for each intensity, mSEPs were recorded in a neutral condition (NC) in which subjects did not have any task, and in an attention condition (AC) in which subjects were asked to count the number of stimuli. In both NC and AC, the N120 and P220 amplitudes were significantly higher at I6 than at I2. while the NI 20 amplitude did not vary between NC and AC, the P220 amplitude was significantly higher in AC than in NC at all stimulus intensities. our results suggest that nociceptive inputs contribute to the N120 amplitude increase at painful stimulus intensity, while the P220 amplitude is more sensitive to changes of subjects' attention level. therefore, the N120 amplitude increase to moderately painful stimuli, as compared to non-painful stimuli, may represent a marker of the activation of the muscular thin myelinated afferents.
feb-2008
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/39
English
muscle pain
somatosensory evoked potentials
attention
nociception
human brain
stimulus intensity
Valeriani, M., Tonali, P., De Armas, L., Mariani, S., Vigevano, F., Le Pera, D. (2008). Nociceptive contribution to the evoked potentials after painful intramuscular electrical stimulation. NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 60(2), 170-175 [10.1016/j.neures.2007.10.008].
Valeriani, M; Tonali, P; De Armas, L; Mariani, S; Vigevano, F; Le Pera, D
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0168010207018202-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 546.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
546.69 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/368063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact