backgroundIn this updated self-care of coronary heart disease Inventory (SC-CHDI) v3.0, items were added to better reflect the theory of self-care of chronic illness and revised based on recent research. the expanded SC-CHDI now reflects the theoretical concepts of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management. objective the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SC-CHDI v3.0. methodsIn a sample of adults with coronary heart disease, we tested the SC-CHDI v3.0 validity with confirmatory factor analysis. reliability was calculated using cronbach alpha, factor score determinacy coefficient, and global reliability index for multidimensional scales, with values > 0.70 considered adequate. results the sample (n = 205) was predominantly male (79%) with a mean age of 65.3 +/- 11.1 years. the self-care maintenance scale encompassed 2 distinct behaviors, namely, "illness related behaviors" and "health promoting behaviors," which reflect consulting and autonomous dimensions, respectively. the goodness-of-fit indices were adequate: chi(2)(25, N = 205) =31.86, P = .16, comparative fit index = 0.97, tucker-lewis Index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.04 (90% confidence interval, 0.00-0.07), P = .705, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.045. analysis of the new self-care monitoring scale yielded a single factor; goodness-of-fit indices were excellent: chi(2)(12, N = 205) =11.56, P = .48, comparative fit index = 1.00, tucker-lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation < 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.000-0.07), P = .86, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. the self-care management scale had 2 dimensions of autonomous and consulting behavior with strong goodness-of-fit indices: chi(2)(7, N = 205) =6.57, P = .47, comparative fit index = 1.00, tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation <= 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.00-0.08), P = .76, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. Reliability estimates were >= 0.80 for all scales. conclusions our testing suggests that the SC-CHDI v3.0 is a sound measure of the essential elements of self-care for adults with coronary heart disease.

Dickson, V.v., Iovino, P., De Maria, M., Vellone, E., Alvaro, R., Di Matteo, R., et al. (2023). Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 38(4), 131-140 [10.1097/jcn.0000000000000952].

Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0

Iovino, Paolo;De Maria, Maddalena;Vellone, Ercole;Alvaro, Rosaria;Bassola, Barbara;Riegel, Barbara
2023-10-24

Abstract

backgroundIn this updated self-care of coronary heart disease Inventory (SC-CHDI) v3.0, items were added to better reflect the theory of self-care of chronic illness and revised based on recent research. the expanded SC-CHDI now reflects the theoretical concepts of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management. objective the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SC-CHDI v3.0. methodsIn a sample of adults with coronary heart disease, we tested the SC-CHDI v3.0 validity with confirmatory factor analysis. reliability was calculated using cronbach alpha, factor score determinacy coefficient, and global reliability index for multidimensional scales, with values > 0.70 considered adequate. results the sample (n = 205) was predominantly male (79%) with a mean age of 65.3 +/- 11.1 years. the self-care maintenance scale encompassed 2 distinct behaviors, namely, "illness related behaviors" and "health promoting behaviors," which reflect consulting and autonomous dimensions, respectively. the goodness-of-fit indices were adequate: chi(2)(25, N = 205) =31.86, P = .16, comparative fit index = 0.97, tucker-lewis Index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.04 (90% confidence interval, 0.00-0.07), P = .705, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.045. analysis of the new self-care monitoring scale yielded a single factor; goodness-of-fit indices were excellent: chi(2)(12, N = 205) =11.56, P = .48, comparative fit index = 1.00, tucker-lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation < 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.000-0.07), P = .86, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. the self-care management scale had 2 dimensions of autonomous and consulting behavior with strong goodness-of-fit indices: chi(2)(7, N = 205) =6.57, P = .47, comparative fit index = 1.00, tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation <= 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.00-0.08), P = .76, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. Reliability estimates were >= 0.80 for all scales. conclusions our testing suggests that the SC-CHDI v3.0 is a sound measure of the essential elements of self-care for adults with coronary heart disease.
24-ott-2023
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/45
English
coronary heart disease
psychometric testing
self-care
Dickson, V.v., Iovino, P., De Maria, M., Vellone, E., Alvaro, R., Di Matteo, R., et al. (2023). Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 38(4), 131-140 [10.1097/jcn.0000000000000952].
Dickson, Vv; Iovino, P; De Maria, M; Vellone, E; Alvaro, R; Di Matteo, R; Molin, Ad; Lusignani, M; Bassola, B; Maconi, A; Bolgeo, T; Riegel, B...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Psychometric_Testing_of_the_Self_Care_of_Coronary_47.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 402.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
402.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/367903
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact