Ulpianus, in his Commentary of edictum to the actio de effusis vel deiectis, tests the possibility of limiting the automatic criterion of joint and several liability of the inhabitores. In this sense, he individuates two possible options for achieving that purpose: a legal one (through the divisio of the apartment or its partial commodate) and a factual one (through the valorization of certain architectural elements, as indications of exclusive enjoyment of a specific portion of the dwelling).
Vinci, M. (2023). Argomentazioni giuridiche ed elementi architettonici: la limitazione della responsabilità solidale nella lettura ulpianea dell’actio de effusis vel deiectis. SPECULA IURIS, 3 (2023)(2 (dicembre 2023)), 23-49.
Argomentazioni giuridiche ed elementi architettonici: la limitazione della responsabilità solidale nella lettura ulpianea dell’actio de effusis vel deiectis
Vinci Massimiliano
2023-01-01
Abstract
Ulpianus, in his Commentary of edictum to the actio de effusis vel deiectis, tests the possibility of limiting the automatic criterion of joint and several liability of the inhabitores. In this sense, he individuates two possible options for achieving that purpose: a legal one (through the divisio of the apartment or its partial commodate) and a factual one (through the valorization of certain architectural elements, as indications of exclusive enjoyment of a specific portion of the dwelling).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SPECULA IURIS Vinci.pdf
embargo fino al 01/01/2025
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.