Background: A large retrospective analysis examined primary aesthetic breast augmentations to find specific factors that could favor or counteract the occurrence of infections. Methods: Data were collected from the personal databases of two different surgeons at the Crown House Hospital, Oldbury, Birmingham, United Kingdom, from January 1999 to December 2004. All the patients who received primary aesthetic breast augmentation with or without associated mastopexy were recorded. Results: A total of 3,002 women were reviewed. Infections were experienced by 33 patients (1.1%). The analysis showed that Mentor prostheses and local antibiotics both were protective against the occurrence of infections (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the use of drains significantly increased the risk fivefold (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The incidence of infections in aesthetic breast augmentations is 1.1%, and Mentor prostheses, antibiotics in the pocket, and the use of drains seem associated with their occurrence.

Araco, A., Gravante, G., Araco, F., Delogu, D., Cervelli, V., Walgenbach, K. (2007). Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: A single-center review of 3,002 patients. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 31(4), 325-329 [10.1007/s00266-006-0156-y].

Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: A single-center review of 3,002 patients

CERVELLI, VALERIO;
2007-01-01

Abstract

Background: A large retrospective analysis examined primary aesthetic breast augmentations to find specific factors that could favor or counteract the occurrence of infections. Methods: Data were collected from the personal databases of two different surgeons at the Crown House Hospital, Oldbury, Birmingham, United Kingdom, from January 1999 to December 2004. All the patients who received primary aesthetic breast augmentation with or without associated mastopexy were recorded. Results: A total of 3,002 women were reviewed. Infections were experienced by 33 patients (1.1%). The analysis showed that Mentor prostheses and local antibiotics both were protective against the occurrence of infections (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the use of drains significantly increased the risk fivefold (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The incidence of infections in aesthetic breast augmentations is 1.1%, and Mentor prostheses, antibiotics in the pocket, and the use of drains seem associated with their occurrence.
2007
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/19 - CHIRURGIA PLASTICA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
aesthetic breast augmentation; complications; infections
Araco, A., Gravante, G., Araco, F., Delogu, D., Cervelli, V., Walgenbach, K. (2007). Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: A single-center review of 3,002 patients. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 31(4), 325-329 [10.1007/s00266-006-0156-y].
Araco, A; Gravante, G; Araco, F; Delogu, D; Cervelli, V; Walgenbach, K
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/36608
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 99
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 87
social impact