increased pain perception due to the expectation to feel more pain is called nocebo effect. the present study aimed at investigating whether: (1) the mere expectation to feel more pain after the administration of an inert drug can affect the laser-pain rating and the laser-evoked potential (LEP) amplitude, and (2) the learning potentiates the nocebo effect. eighteen healthy volunteers were told that an inert cream, applied on the right hand, would increase the laser pain and LEP amplitude to right hand stimulation. they were randomly assigned to either "verbal session" or "conditioning session". In the "verbal session", LEPs to both right and left hand stimulation were recorded at the same intensity before (baseline) and after cream application. In the "conditioning session", after an initial cream application the laser stimulus intensity was increased surreptitiously to make the subjects believe that the treatment really increased the pain sensation. then, the cream was reapplied, and LEPs were recorded at the same stimulus intensity as at the baseline. It was found that the verbal suggestion to feel more pain disrupted the physiological habituation of the laser-pain rating and LEP amplitude to treated (right) hand stimulation. Unlike previously demonstrated for the placebo effect, the learning did not potentiate the nocebo effect. (C) 2016 IBRO.

Pazzaglia, C., Testani, E., Giordano, R., Padua, L., Valeriani, M. (2016). Expectation to feel more pain disrupts the habituation of laser-pain rating and laser-evoked potential amplitudes. NEUROSCIENCE, 333, 244-251 [10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.027].

Expectation to feel more pain disrupts the habituation of laser-pain rating and laser-evoked potential amplitudes

Valeriani, Massimiliano
2016-10-01

Abstract

increased pain perception due to the expectation to feel more pain is called nocebo effect. the present study aimed at investigating whether: (1) the mere expectation to feel more pain after the administration of an inert drug can affect the laser-pain rating and the laser-evoked potential (LEP) amplitude, and (2) the learning potentiates the nocebo effect. eighteen healthy volunteers were told that an inert cream, applied on the right hand, would increase the laser pain and LEP amplitude to right hand stimulation. they were randomly assigned to either "verbal session" or "conditioning session". In the "verbal session", LEPs to both right and left hand stimulation were recorded at the same intensity before (baseline) and after cream application. In the "conditioning session", after an initial cream application the laser stimulus intensity was increased surreptitiously to make the subjects believe that the treatment really increased the pain sensation. then, the cream was reapplied, and LEPs were recorded at the same stimulus intensity as at the baseline. It was found that the verbal suggestion to feel more pain disrupted the physiological habituation of the laser-pain rating and LEP amplitude to treated (right) hand stimulation. Unlike previously demonstrated for the placebo effect, the learning did not potentiate the nocebo effect. (C) 2016 IBRO.
1-ott-2016
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/39
English
laser-evoked potentials
learning
nocebo
verbal suggestion
Pazzaglia, C., Testani, E., Giordano, R., Padua, L., Valeriani, M. (2016). Expectation to feel more pain disrupts the habituation of laser-pain rating and laser-evoked potential amplitudes. NEUROSCIENCE, 333, 244-251 [10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.027].
Pazzaglia, C; Testani, E; Giordano, R; Padua, L; Valeriani, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0306452216303323-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 874.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
874.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/365943
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact