background: this study aims to assess the benefit of a deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) over the standard irradiation technique, and eventually to identify anatomical and/or treatment preplanning characteristics correlated with the LAD dose. methods: patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing whole breast radiotherapy with DIBH were analyzed. all patients included in the analysis had plans in DIBH and free-breathing (FB). receiving operating characteristics (ROC analysis) were used to identify the cut-off point of parameters to predict the LAD maximum dose > 10 Gy and LAD mean dose > 4 gy, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were computed. post-test probability has been performed to evaluate the effect of parameters' combination. results: one hundred ninety-seven patients were analyzed. the LAD dose was significantly reduced in DIBH plans with the maximum and mean dose reduced by 31.7% (mean value 3.5 Gy vs. 4.8 Gy, p <= 0.001) and 28.1% (mean value 8.2 Gy vs. 12.8 Gy, p <= 0.001) in DIBH plans compared to FB plans. the strongest predictor of the LAD dose (maximum > 10 Gy and mean > 4 Gy) was the minimum distance of LAD from tangent open fields. other parameters were lung volume and heart volume (LAD Dmax > 10 Gy) and lung volume, heart volume, and breast separation (LAD Dmean > 4 Gy). conclusion: the dosimetric advantage of DIBH is clear in all patients and DIBH should always be preferred.

Ippolito, E., Greco, C., Marrocco, M., Rinaldi, C.g., Fiore, M., Trodella, L.e., et al. (2023). Preventing Cardiotoxicity in Personalized Breast Irradiation. CANCERS, 15(21) [10.3390/cancers15215153].

Preventing Cardiotoxicity in Personalized Breast Irradiation

D'Angelillo, Rolando Maria;
2023-10-26

Abstract

background: this study aims to assess the benefit of a deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) over the standard irradiation technique, and eventually to identify anatomical and/or treatment preplanning characteristics correlated with the LAD dose. methods: patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing whole breast radiotherapy with DIBH were analyzed. all patients included in the analysis had plans in DIBH and free-breathing (FB). receiving operating characteristics (ROC analysis) were used to identify the cut-off point of parameters to predict the LAD maximum dose > 10 Gy and LAD mean dose > 4 gy, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were computed. post-test probability has been performed to evaluate the effect of parameters' combination. results: one hundred ninety-seven patients were analyzed. the LAD dose was significantly reduced in DIBH plans with the maximum and mean dose reduced by 31.7% (mean value 3.5 Gy vs. 4.8 Gy, p <= 0.001) and 28.1% (mean value 8.2 Gy vs. 12.8 Gy, p <= 0.001) in DIBH plans compared to FB plans. the strongest predictor of the LAD dose (maximum > 10 Gy and mean > 4 Gy) was the minimum distance of LAD from tangent open fields. other parameters were lung volume and heart volume (LAD Dmax > 10 Gy) and lung volume, heart volume, and breast separation (LAD Dmean > 4 Gy). conclusion: the dosimetric advantage of DIBH is clear in all patients and DIBH should always be preferred.
26-ott-2023
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/36
Settore MEDS-22/A - Diagnostica per immagini e radioterapia
English
DIBH
breast cancer
breast irradiation
left descending artery
Ippolito, E., Greco, C., Marrocco, M., Rinaldi, C.g., Fiore, M., Trodella, L.e., et al. (2023). Preventing Cardiotoxicity in Personalized Breast Irradiation. CANCERS, 15(21) [10.3390/cancers15215153].
Ippolito, E; Greco, C; Marrocco, M; Rinaldi, Cg; Fiore, M; Trodella, Le; D'Angelillo, Rm; Ramella, S
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
breast cardiotoxicity.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 829.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
829.06 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/364928
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact