consistent with insights from both trait and social cognitive theories, this study presents a theoretical model positing emotional self-efficacy beliefs in managing negative emotions at work as a key mechanism that contributes to mediate the negative relationship between emotional stability – a trait highly associated with positive affect and mental health – and job burnout. to test this assertion, a two-wave study using a representative sample of 416 new military cadets of an Italian military academy was designed. military cadets were involved in the study 2 months after their entrance into the academy and then again, a year later. results from structural equation modelling supported the hypothesized model. as predicted, self-efficacy beliefs in managing negative emotions at work significantly mediated the longitudinal relation between emotional stability and job burnout, even after controlling for the effect of the other big five traits, education, previous experience in military contexts, gender, and age. practical implications and directions for future research are discussed. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that self-efficacy in managing negative emotions at work represents an important mechanism linking emotional stability level to burnout symptoms.

Alessandri, G., Perinelli, E., De Longis, E., Schaufeli, W.b., Theodorou, A., Borgogni, L., et al. (2018). Job burnout: the contribution of emotional stability and emotional self-efficacy beliefs. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY [10.1111/joop.12225].

Job burnout: the contribution of emotional stability and emotional self-efficacy beliefs

Theodorou, Annalisa;
2018-01-01

Abstract

consistent with insights from both trait and social cognitive theories, this study presents a theoretical model positing emotional self-efficacy beliefs in managing negative emotions at work as a key mechanism that contributes to mediate the negative relationship between emotional stability – a trait highly associated with positive affect and mental health – and job burnout. to test this assertion, a two-wave study using a representative sample of 416 new military cadets of an Italian military academy was designed. military cadets were involved in the study 2 months after their entrance into the academy and then again, a year later. results from structural equation modelling supported the hypothesized model. as predicted, self-efficacy beliefs in managing negative emotions at work significantly mediated the longitudinal relation between emotional stability and job burnout, even after controlling for the effect of the other big five traits, education, previous experience in military contexts, gender, and age. practical implications and directions for future research are discussed. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that self-efficacy in managing negative emotions at work represents an important mechanism linking emotional stability level to burnout symptoms.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-PSI/06 - Psicologia del Lavoro e delle Organizzazioni
English
job burnout
emotional stability
self-efficacy beliefs
Alessandri, G., Perinelli, E., De Longis, E., Schaufeli, W.b., Theodorou, A., Borgogni, L., et al. (2018). Job burnout: the contribution of emotional stability and emotional self-efficacy beliefs. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY [10.1111/joop.12225].
Alessandri, G; Perinelli, E; De Longis, E; Schaufeli, Wb; Theodorou, A; Borgogni, L; Caprara, Gv
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2018.Alessandri,Perinelli,DeLongis,Schaufeli,Theodorou,Borgogni,Caprara,Cinque.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 355.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
355.78 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/362670
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 55
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact