Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address the limited generalizability of studies on defense mechanisms in depression by comparing depressive individuals with non-clinical controls (aim a) and examining changes throughout psychological interventions (aim b) (PROSPERO CRD42023442620). Methods: We followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed/Web of Science/(EBSCO)PsycINFO until 13/04/2023 for studies evaluating defense mechanisms with measures based on the hierarchical model in depressive patients versus non-clinical controls or throughout psychological intervention. We conducted random-effect meta-analyses for mature defenses/non-mature (neurotic/immature) defenses/overall defensive functioning (ODF), with standardized mean difference (SMD) as outcome measure metric. Meta-regression/sub-group/sensitivity analyses were conducted. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and certainty of evidence for aim b outcomes was evaluated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). Results: 18 studies were included (mean NOS score = 5.56). Depressive patients used significantly more nonmature defenses than non-clinical controls (SMD = 0.74; k = 13). Non-clinical controls did not significantly differ in use of mature defenses compared to depressive patients (SMD = 0.33; k = 14). Significant moderators were publication year/NOS score/geographical distribution/mean age for non-mature defenses and NOS score/geographical distribution for mature defenses. Throughout psychological interventions, only ODF significantly increased (SMD = 0.55; k = 2) (GRADE = very low). Limitations: Quality of many studies was medium/sub-optimal, and longitudinal studies were scarce. Conclusion: Individuals with depressive disorders show a high use of non-mature defenses that could be assessed and targeted in psychological interventions, especially in younger patients.

Fiorentino, F., Lo Buglio, G., Morelli, M., Chirumbolo, A., DI GIUSEPPE, M., Lingiardi, V., et al. (2024). Defensive functioning in individuals with depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 357, 42-50 [10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.091].

Defensive functioning in individuals with depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address the limited generalizability of studies on defense mechanisms in depression by comparing depressive individuals with non-clinical controls (aim a) and examining changes throughout psychological interventions (aim b) (PROSPERO CRD42023442620). Methods: We followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed/Web of Science/(EBSCO)PsycINFO until 13/04/2023 for studies evaluating defense mechanisms with measures based on the hierarchical model in depressive patients versus non-clinical controls or throughout psychological intervention. We conducted random-effect meta-analyses for mature defenses/non-mature (neurotic/immature) defenses/overall defensive functioning (ODF), with standardized mean difference (SMD) as outcome measure metric. Meta-regression/sub-group/sensitivity analyses were conducted. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and certainty of evidence for aim b outcomes was evaluated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). Results: 18 studies were included (mean NOS score = 5.56). Depressive patients used significantly more nonmature defenses than non-clinical controls (SMD = 0.74; k = 13). Non-clinical controls did not significantly differ in use of mature defenses compared to depressive patients (SMD = 0.33; k = 14). Significant moderators were publication year/NOS score/geographical distribution/mean age for non-mature defenses and NOS score/geographical distribution for mature defenses. Throughout psychological interventions, only ODF significantly increased (SMD = 0.55; k = 2) (GRADE = very low). Limitations: Quality of many studies was medium/sub-optimal, and longitudinal studies were scarce. Conclusion: Individuals with depressive disorders show a high use of non-mature defenses that could be assessed and targeted in psychological interventions, especially in younger patients.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Review
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-PSI/08
Settore PSIC-04/B - Psicologia clinica
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Depression; Depressive disorders; Defense mechanisms; DMRS; Meta-analysis
Fiorentino, F., Lo Buglio, G., Morelli, M., Chirumbolo, A., DI GIUSEPPE, M., Lingiardi, V., et al. (2024). Defensive functioning in individuals with depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 357, 42-50 [10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.091].
Fiorentino, F; Lo Buglio, G; Morelli, M; Chirumbolo, A; DI GIUSEPPE, M; Lingiardi, V; Tanzilli, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024 JAD - Fiorentino et al.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 963.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
963.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/361684
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact