Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of anterior and posterior dacryorhinocystostomy (En-Dcr) by assessing the surgical outcome with a new objective technique, nose sinus manometry. Materials and methods: Thirty adult patients presenting nasolacrimal duct obstruction were enrolled in this study and randomly divided in two groups. In group A patients underwent anterior endonasal dacryorhinocystostomy, group B underwent the posterior approach. All patients were evaluated through Nose Sinus Manometry, endoscopic dye disappearance functional test (EDFT) and subjective assessment three months post-op. Pearson test and T-student Test were used for evaluations. Results: The mean differences in the pressure values were significantly different in the two groups of treatment, therefore, the patients of group B had strong improvement in pressure values compared with patients of group A. Conclusion: This study confirms a relevant physical distinction between posterior En-Dcr outcomes compared to anterior En-Dcr and reveals a significant success rate difference between the two groups of patients. The posterior surgical technique shows better results than the anterior one, by providing an almost physiological post- operative endonasal outcome. These results also showed the effectiveness of Nose Sinus Manometry in assessing the post- operative outcomes after En-Dcr.

Bruno, E., Roselli, L., Porozaj, D., De Berardinis, R., Gamerra, M. (2021). Nose sinus manometry in evaluating functional outcomes of anterior and posterior endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 72(4) [10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.06.001].

Nose sinus manometry in evaluating functional outcomes of anterior and posterior endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Bruno, Ernesto;Roselli, Lucrezia;Porozaj, Dea;De Berardinis, Rita;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of anterior and posterior dacryorhinocystostomy (En-Dcr) by assessing the surgical outcome with a new objective technique, nose sinus manometry. Materials and methods: Thirty adult patients presenting nasolacrimal duct obstruction were enrolled in this study and randomly divided in two groups. In group A patients underwent anterior endonasal dacryorhinocystostomy, group B underwent the posterior approach. All patients were evaluated through Nose Sinus Manometry, endoscopic dye disappearance functional test (EDFT) and subjective assessment three months post-op. Pearson test and T-student Test were used for evaluations. Results: The mean differences in the pressure values were significantly different in the two groups of treatment, therefore, the patients of group B had strong improvement in pressure values compared with patients of group A. Conclusion: This study confirms a relevant physical distinction between posterior En-Dcr outcomes compared to anterior En-Dcr and reveals a significant success rate difference between the two groups of patients. The posterior surgical technique shows better results than the anterior one, by providing an almost physiological post- operative endonasal outcome. These results also showed the effectiveness of Nose Sinus Manometry in assessing the post- operative outcomes after En-Dcr.
2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/31
English
Dacriocistorrinostomía endoscópica
Endoscopic Dacryorhinocystostomy
Epiphora
Epífora
Manometría del seno nasal
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
Nose Sinus Manometry
Obstrucción del conducto nasolagrimal
Bruno, E., Roselli, L., Porozaj, D., De Berardinis, R., Gamerra, M. (2021). Nose sinus manometry in evaluating functional outcomes of anterior and posterior endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 72(4) [10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.06.001].
Bruno, E; Roselli, L; Porozaj, D; De Berardinis, R; Gamerra, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/361464
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact