background: this study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of serum PCT in older patients with suspect sepsis or infective diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) with a particular focus on the clinical consequences and characteristics due to frailty status. methods: this is a observational retrospective study conducted in the ED of a teaching hospital. we identified all consecutive patients aged & GE; 80 years admitted to the ED and subsequently hospitalized for clinical suspicion of infection. Inclusion criteria were: age & GE; 80 years and clinical suspicion of infection; availability of a PCT determination obtained < 24 h since ED access; and clinical frailty scale (CFS) determination. study endpoints were the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for all-cause in-hospital death, infective diagnosis at discharge, and bloodstream infection. diagnostic accuracy was calculated via ROC analysis and compared in the patients with severe frailty, measured by CFS > 6, and patients with low or moderate frailty (CFS 1-6). a multivariate analysis was performed to calculate the adjusted odds of raised PCT values for the study endpoints. results: In total, 1459 adults & GE; 80 years with a clinical suspicion of infection were included in the study cohort. the median age of the sample was 85 years (82-89), with 718 (49.2%) males. the multivariate models revealed that, after adjusting for significant covariates, the PCT values at ED admission were significantly associated with higher odds of infective diagnosis only in the fit/moderately frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.04 [1.01-1.08], p 0.009) and not in very frail patients (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.02 [0.99-1.06], p 0.130). similarly, PCT values were significantly associated with higher odds of in-hospital death in the fit/moderately frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.01 [1.00-1.02], p 0.047), but not in the very frail ones (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.00 [0.98-1.02], p 0.948). conversely, the PCT values were confirmed to be a good independent predictor of bloodstream infection in both the fit/moderately frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.06 [1.04-1.08], p < 0.001) and the very frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.05 [1.03-1.07], p < 0.001). conclusions: The PCT values at ED admission do not predict infective diagnosis, nor are associated with higher odds of in-hospital death. still, in frail older adults, the PCT values in ED could be a useful predictor of bloodstream infection.

Russo, A., Salini, S., Gava, G., Merra, G., Piccioni, A., De Matteis, G., et al. (2023). Reduced Prognostic Role of Serum PCT Measurement in Very Frail Older Adults Admitted to the Emergency Department. ANTIBIOTICS, 12(6) [10.3390/antibiotics12061036].

Reduced Prognostic Role of Serum PCT Measurement in Very Frail Older Adults Admitted to the Emergency Department

Giuseppe Merra;
2023-01-01

Abstract

background: this study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of serum PCT in older patients with suspect sepsis or infective diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) with a particular focus on the clinical consequences and characteristics due to frailty status. methods: this is a observational retrospective study conducted in the ED of a teaching hospital. we identified all consecutive patients aged & GE; 80 years admitted to the ED and subsequently hospitalized for clinical suspicion of infection. Inclusion criteria were: age & GE; 80 years and clinical suspicion of infection; availability of a PCT determination obtained < 24 h since ED access; and clinical frailty scale (CFS) determination. study endpoints were the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for all-cause in-hospital death, infective diagnosis at discharge, and bloodstream infection. diagnostic accuracy was calculated via ROC analysis and compared in the patients with severe frailty, measured by CFS > 6, and patients with low or moderate frailty (CFS 1-6). a multivariate analysis was performed to calculate the adjusted odds of raised PCT values for the study endpoints. results: In total, 1459 adults & GE; 80 years with a clinical suspicion of infection were included in the study cohort. the median age of the sample was 85 years (82-89), with 718 (49.2%) males. the multivariate models revealed that, after adjusting for significant covariates, the PCT values at ED admission were significantly associated with higher odds of infective diagnosis only in the fit/moderately frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.04 [1.01-1.08], p 0.009) and not in very frail patients (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.02 [0.99-1.06], p 0.130). similarly, PCT values were significantly associated with higher odds of in-hospital death in the fit/moderately frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.01 [1.00-1.02], p 0.047), but not in the very frail ones (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.00 [0.98-1.02], p 0.948). conversely, the PCT values were confirmed to be a good independent predictor of bloodstream infection in both the fit/moderately frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.06 [1.04-1.08], p < 0.001) and the very frail group (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.05 [1.03-1.07], p < 0.001). conclusions: The PCT values at ED admission do not predict infective diagnosis, nor are associated with higher odds of in-hospital death. still, in frail older adults, the PCT values in ED could be a useful predictor of bloodstream infection.
2023
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/09
English
elderly
emergency department
frailty
procalcitonin
sepsis
Russo, A., Salini, S., Gava, G., Merra, G., Piccioni, A., De Matteis, G., et al. (2023). Reduced Prognostic Role of Serum PCT Measurement in Very Frail Older Adults Admitted to the Emergency Department. ANTIBIOTICS, 12(6) [10.3390/antibiotics12061036].
Russo, A; Salini, S; Gava, G; Merra, G; Piccioni, A; De Matteis, G; Tullo, G; Novelli, A; Petrucci, M; Gasbarrini, A; Landi, F; Franceschi, F; Covino, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/359132
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact