Purpose - This paper aims to (1) identify the different performance drivers (lead indicators) and outcome measures (lag indicators) investigated in the literature concerning the four balanced scorecard (BSC) perspectives in operations management (OM) contexts and (2) understand how performance drivers and outcome measures (and substantiated perspectives) are related. Design/methodology/approach - We undertake a systematic literature review of the BSC literature in OM journals. From the final sample of 40 articles, performance drivers and outcome measures have been identified, and the relationships amongst them have been synthesised according to the system dynamics approach. Findings - Findings show (1) the most relevant performance drivers and outcome measures within each BSC perspective, (2) their relationships, (3) how the perspectives are linked through the performance drivers and outcome measures and (4) how the different measures relate systemically. Accordingly, four causal loops amongst identified measures have been built, which - jointly considered - allowed for the creation of a dynamic strategy map for OM. Originality/value - This study is the first one that provides a comprehensive and holistic view of how the different performance drivers and outcome measures within and between the four BSC perspectives in OM relate systemically, increasing the knowledge and understanding of scholars and practitioners.

Hristov, I., Cristofaro, M., Camilli, R., Leoni, L. (2024). A system dynamics approach to the balanced scorecard: a review and dynamic strategy map for operations management. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT [10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069].

A system dynamics approach to the balanced scorecard: a review and dynamic strategy map for operations management

Hristov, Ivo;Cristofaro, Matteo;Camilli, Riccardo;Leoni, Luna
2024-01-01

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to (1) identify the different performance drivers (lead indicators) and outcome measures (lag indicators) investigated in the literature concerning the four balanced scorecard (BSC) perspectives in operations management (OM) contexts and (2) understand how performance drivers and outcome measures (and substantiated perspectives) are related. Design/methodology/approach - We undertake a systematic literature review of the BSC literature in OM journals. From the final sample of 40 articles, performance drivers and outcome measures have been identified, and the relationships amongst them have been synthesised according to the system dynamics approach. Findings - Findings show (1) the most relevant performance drivers and outcome measures within each BSC perspective, (2) their relationships, (3) how the perspectives are linked through the performance drivers and outcome measures and (4) how the different measures relate systemically. Accordingly, four causal loops amongst identified measures have been built, which - jointly considered - allowed for the creation of a dynamic strategy map for OM. Originality/value - This study is the first one that provides a comprehensive and holistic view of how the different performance drivers and outcome measures within and between the four BSC perspectives in OM relate systemically, increasing the knowledge and understanding of scholars and practitioners.
2024
In corso di stampa
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/08
English
Balanced scorecard
Operations management
Performance management
System dynamics
Systematic literature review
Hristov, I., Cristofaro, M., Camilli, R., Leoni, L. (2024). A system dynamics approach to the balanced scorecard: a review and dynamic strategy map for operations management. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT [10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069].
Hristov, I; Cristofaro, M; Camilli, R; Leoni, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/356503
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact