BACKGROUND: Oxygen consumption volume (VO2) and resting energy expenditure are increased in emphysema because of impaired respiratory function and mechanics, with greater oxygen cost of breathing and altered metabolism. We hypothesized that lung volume reduction surgery may improve energy expenditure and metabolism. METHODS: In this 1-year prospective study, 30 patients with moderate-to-severe emphysema underwent bilateral lung volume reduction surgery; 28 similar patients, who refused operation, followed a standard respiratory rehabilitation program. Oxygen consumption volume and resting energy expenditure, both corrected for fat-free mass, VO2 proportion of respiratory muscles (%VO2Resp), respiratory quotient, and energy substrate oxidation were determined by using a calorimetric chamber with indirect methods. RESULTS: Only after surgery significant improvements resulted in 1-second forced expiratory volume (+20.4%, p = 0.009), residual volume (-24.8%, p = 0.001), diffusion-lung carbon-monoxide (+18.4%, p = 0.008), body mass index (+5.5%, p = 0.01), resting energy expenditure (-8.2%, p = 0.006), and %VO2Resp (-44.1%, p = 0.0008) with increase in respiratory quotient (0.79 versus 0.84, p = 0.03) and conversion from prevalent lipid (44.6% versus 34.3%, p = 0.0007) to prevalent carbohydrate (25.2% versus 42.2%, p = 0.0006) metabolism. Thirteen operated on patients discontinued oral steroids, showing the most significant improvements. The remaining 17 experienced significant changes compared with the rehabilitation group despite oral steroids (resting energy expenditure -7.0% versus +4.1%, and %VO2Resp -34.0% versus +0.7%, p = 0.001). Decrease of resting energy expenditure and %VO2Resp correlated with reduction of residual volume (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001) and increment of body mass index (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Lung volume reduction surgery significantly decreased %VO2Resp and resting energy expenditure over respiratory rehabilitation and despite oral steroid therapy. Substrate oxidation changed from prevalent lipid to prevalent carbohydrate. Correlations with residual volume and nutritional status suggest that restoration of respiratory mechanics reduces energy expenditure and approximates metabolism to normal.

Mineo, T.c., Pompeo, E., Mineo, D., Ambrogi, V., Ciarapica, D., Polito, A. (2006). Resting energy expenditure and metabolic changes after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 82(4), 1205-1211 [10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.030].

Resting energy expenditure and metabolic changes after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

MINEO, TOMMASO CLAUDIO;POMPEO, EUGENIO;MINEO, DAVIDE;AMBROGI, VINCENZO;
2006-10-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oxygen consumption volume (VO2) and resting energy expenditure are increased in emphysema because of impaired respiratory function and mechanics, with greater oxygen cost of breathing and altered metabolism. We hypothesized that lung volume reduction surgery may improve energy expenditure and metabolism. METHODS: In this 1-year prospective study, 30 patients with moderate-to-severe emphysema underwent bilateral lung volume reduction surgery; 28 similar patients, who refused operation, followed a standard respiratory rehabilitation program. Oxygen consumption volume and resting energy expenditure, both corrected for fat-free mass, VO2 proportion of respiratory muscles (%VO2Resp), respiratory quotient, and energy substrate oxidation were determined by using a calorimetric chamber with indirect methods. RESULTS: Only after surgery significant improvements resulted in 1-second forced expiratory volume (+20.4%, p = 0.009), residual volume (-24.8%, p = 0.001), diffusion-lung carbon-monoxide (+18.4%, p = 0.008), body mass index (+5.5%, p = 0.01), resting energy expenditure (-8.2%, p = 0.006), and %VO2Resp (-44.1%, p = 0.0008) with increase in respiratory quotient (0.79 versus 0.84, p = 0.03) and conversion from prevalent lipid (44.6% versus 34.3%, p = 0.0007) to prevalent carbohydrate (25.2% versus 42.2%, p = 0.0006) metabolism. Thirteen operated on patients discontinued oral steroids, showing the most significant improvements. The remaining 17 experienced significant changes compared with the rehabilitation group despite oral steroids (resting energy expenditure -7.0% versus +4.1%, and %VO2Resp -34.0% versus +0.7%, p = 0.001). Decrease of resting energy expenditure and %VO2Resp correlated with reduction of residual volume (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001) and increment of body mass index (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Lung volume reduction surgery significantly decreased %VO2Resp and resting energy expenditure over respiratory rehabilitation and despite oral steroid therapy. Substrate oxidation changed from prevalent lipid to prevalent carbohydrate. Correlations with residual volume and nutritional status suggest that restoration of respiratory mechanics reduces energy expenditure and approximates metabolism to normal.
ott-2006
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/21 - CHIRURGIA TORACICA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Respiratory Function Tests; Nutrition Assessment; Humans; Aged; Energy Metabolism; Glucocorticoids; Pulmonary Emphysema; Pneumonectomy; Oxygen Consumption; Prospective Studies; Rest; Middle Aged; Male
Mineo, T.c., Pompeo, E., Mineo, D., Ambrogi, V., Ciarapica, D., Polito, A. (2006). Resting energy expenditure and metabolic changes after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 82(4), 1205-1211 [10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.030].
Mineo, Tc; Pompeo, E; Mineo, D; Ambrogi, V; Ciarapica, D; Polito, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 283.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
283.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/35475
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact