Introduction: the aim of this prospective and randomized study is to analyze and compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (Eaton-Littler grade III and IV). materials and methods: 52 consecutive patients underwent surgical intervention by two different surgical techniques and checked for subjective outcomes (DASH, NPRS), objective outcomes (ROM, opposition test, grinding test, pulp pinch, hand grip) and radiographic outcomes. surgical time was calculated. results: 26 patients underwent suspension arthroplasty using abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition (ceruso procedure) and 26 patients underwent arthroplasty using suspension tenoplasty of the flexor radialis carpi (altissimi procedure). both techniques were performed by a single surgeon and showed good and satisfactory results, with best outcome reported in altissimi procedure regarding DASH and ROM (p = 0.011 and p = 0.012, respectively), with reduced surgical time (about 6 min less, p = 0.03). the proximal shift between scaphoid and the base of first metacarpal did not influence the final results of the cases treated. conclusion: this study provides evidence that trapeziectomy in combination with both tendon suspension arthroplasty and tendon interposition are two surgical procedures useful to solve advanced basal joint arthritis. patients who underwent suspension tenoplasty without tendon interposition seemed to be generally more satisfied with significantly better symptomatic and functional outcomes.

Fidanza, A., Rovere, G., Colafarina, O., Chiarolanza, F., Fulchignoni, C., Smakaj, A., et al. (2024). Tenoplasty in suspension with or without tendon interposition: A prospective randomized study in the treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 49, 128-133 [10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.066].

Tenoplasty in suspension with or without tendon interposition: A prospective randomized study in the treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis

Farsetti P.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: the aim of this prospective and randomized study is to analyze and compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (Eaton-Littler grade III and IV). materials and methods: 52 consecutive patients underwent surgical intervention by two different surgical techniques and checked for subjective outcomes (DASH, NPRS), objective outcomes (ROM, opposition test, grinding test, pulp pinch, hand grip) and radiographic outcomes. surgical time was calculated. results: 26 patients underwent suspension arthroplasty using abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition (ceruso procedure) and 26 patients underwent arthroplasty using suspension tenoplasty of the flexor radialis carpi (altissimi procedure). both techniques were performed by a single surgeon and showed good and satisfactory results, with best outcome reported in altissimi procedure regarding DASH and ROM (p = 0.011 and p = 0.012, respectively), with reduced surgical time (about 6 min less, p = 0.03). the proximal shift between scaphoid and the base of first metacarpal did not influence the final results of the cases treated. conclusion: this study provides evidence that trapeziectomy in combination with both tendon suspension arthroplasty and tendon interposition are two surgical procedures useful to solve advanced basal joint arthritis. patients who underwent suspension tenoplasty without tendon interposition seemed to be generally more satisfied with significantly better symptomatic and functional outcomes.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/33
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Abductor pollicis longus
Basal joint arthritis
Flexor radialis carpi
LTRI
Rhizarthrosis
Trapeziectomy
Trapeziometacarpal arthritis
Fidanza, A., Rovere, G., Colafarina, O., Chiarolanza, F., Fulchignoni, C., Smakaj, A., et al. (2024). Tenoplasty in suspension with or without tendon interposition: A prospective randomized study in the treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 49, 128-133 [10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.066].
Fidanza, A; Rovere, G; Colafarina, O; Chiarolanza, F; Fulchignoni, C; Smakaj, A; Liuzza, F; Farsetti, P; Logroscino, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/351713
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact