IntroductionSevere asthma patients often remain uncontrolled despite high-intensity therapies. Biological therapies targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a key player in asthma pathogenesis, have emerged as potential options. Currently, the only TSLP inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe asthma is the immunoglobulin G (IgG) 2 lambda anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody (mAb) tezepelumab.Areas coveredThis systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of investigational TSLP inhibitors across different stages of development for asthma treatment.Expert OpinionTSLP contributes to airway inflammation, making it a pivotal therapeutic target. Ecleralimab, an inhaled antibody fragment antigen binding, shows promising evidence in enhancing efficacy and reducing systemic adverse events. SAR443765, with its NANOBODY (R) formulation and bispecific inhibition of TSLP and IL-13, offers improved tissue penetration and efficacy. The mAB TQC2731 exhibits high in vitro bioactivity, and the strength of the mAb UPB-101 is to act against the TSLP receptor. Some studies include mild and moderate asthma patients, suggesting the potential for extending biological therapy to non-severe patients. This systematic review highlights the potential of TSLP inhibitors as valuable additions to asthma treatment, even in milder forms of the disease. Future research and cost-reduction efforts are needed to expanding access to these promising therapies.

Rogliani, P., Manzetti, G.m., Bettin, F.r., D’Auria, M., Calzetta, L. (2024). Investigational thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitors for the treatment of asthma: a systematic review. EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 33(1), 39-49 [10.1080/13543784.2024.2305144].

Investigational thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitors for the treatment of asthma: a systematic review

Rogliani P.
;
Manzetti G. M.;Bettin F. R.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

IntroductionSevere asthma patients often remain uncontrolled despite high-intensity therapies. Biological therapies targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a key player in asthma pathogenesis, have emerged as potential options. Currently, the only TSLP inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe asthma is the immunoglobulin G (IgG) 2 lambda anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody (mAb) tezepelumab.Areas coveredThis systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of investigational TSLP inhibitors across different stages of development for asthma treatment.Expert OpinionTSLP contributes to airway inflammation, making it a pivotal therapeutic target. Ecleralimab, an inhaled antibody fragment antigen binding, shows promising evidence in enhancing efficacy and reducing systemic adverse events. SAR443765, with its NANOBODY (R) formulation and bispecific inhibition of TSLP and IL-13, offers improved tissue penetration and efficacy. The mAB TQC2731 exhibits high in vitro bioactivity, and the strength of the mAb UPB-101 is to act against the TSLP receptor. Some studies include mild and moderate asthma patients, suggesting the potential for extending biological therapy to non-severe patients. This systematic review highlights the potential of TSLP inhibitors as valuable additions to asthma treatment, even in milder forms of the disease. Future research and cost-reduction efforts are needed to expanding access to these promising therapies.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Review
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/10
English
TSLP
asthma
monoclonal antibody
nanobody
Rogliani, P., Manzetti, G.m., Bettin, F.r., D’Auria, M., Calzetta, L. (2024). Investigational thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitors for the treatment of asthma: a systematic review. EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 33(1), 39-49 [10.1080/13543784.2024.2305144].
Rogliani, P; Manzetti, Gm; Bettin, Fr; D’Auria, M; Calzetta, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/351366
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact