This note aims to show that the text attested by the Medieval sources for Plotinus, Ennead IV, 6 (41) 2, 22-24 can be retained, notwithstanding the doubts of several scholars who tried to amend it. Retaining the manuscript tradition enables us to read in the passage three different kinds of vision of the soul : (1) the soul's ordinary vision of itself, characterized by duality and otherness; (2) the soul's vision of intellect and (3) its vision of itself, when she is within the intelligible : both these visions are characterized by the unified duality of the subject and the object of vision.
Taormina, D.p. (2022). Comment l’âme voit l’intellect. Une note textuelle en marge de Plotin, Enn. IV 6 (41) 2, 22-24. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE PLATONIC TRADITION, 16(2), 152-162 [10.1163/18725473-12341536].
Comment l’âme voit l’intellect. Une note textuelle en marge de Plotin, Enn. IV 6 (41) 2, 22-24
Daniela P. Taormina
2022-01-01
Abstract
This note aims to show that the text attested by the Medieval sources for Plotinus, Ennead IV, 6 (41) 2, 22-24 can be retained, notwithstanding the doubts of several scholars who tried to amend it. Retaining the manuscript tradition enables us to read in the passage three different kinds of vision of the soul : (1) the soul's ordinary vision of itself, characterized by duality and otherness; (2) the soul's vision of intellect and (3) its vision of itself, when she is within the intelligible : both these visions are characterized by the unified duality of the subject and the object of vision.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
