Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachments in superior versus temporal approach

purpose to evaluate the difference in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment rate comparing superior versus temporal main incision approach. Methods Retrospective comparative study on patients who underwent DMEK surgery for fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy with main wound incision performed at either 90 degrees in the superior approach, or at 180 degrees/0 degrees in the temporal approach. All main incisions were secured with a single 10-0 nylon suture at the end of surgery. data collected were donor age and gender, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and gender, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, re-bubbling rate, air fill in the anterior chamber (AC) at day one and intra- and early postoperative complications. results 187 eyes were included in the study. 99 eyes had DMEK surgery with superior approach, while 88 eyes had temporal approach. the two groups had no differences in donor age and sex, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and sex, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, and air fill in the anterior chamber at day one. re-bubbling rate was 38.4% for surgeries performed with superior access and 29.5% for those with temporal access(p = 0.186). after exclusion of patients with intraoperative and/or postoperative complication, the difference in re-bubbling rate was higher, although non-significant (37.5% and 25% for superior and temporal approach respectively, p = 0.098). conclusion the temporal approach in DMEK showed a trend towards a clinically significant lower rate of post-operative re-bubbling compared to the superior approach, however, no statistically significant difference was noted comparing the two approaches, which both remain feasible options in DMEK surgery.