The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). The present study aimed at assessing, in a large sample of SCZ (n = 601), the agreement between patients and their informants on CAI ratings, to explore patients' insight in their cognitive deficits and its relationships with clinical and functional indices. Agreement between patient- and informant-based ratings was assessed by the Gwet's agreement coefficient. Predictors of insight in cognitive deficits were explored by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Patients reported lower severity of cognitive impairment vs. informants. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between patients' and informants' ratings. Lower insight in cognitive deficits was associated to greater severity of neurocognitive impairment and positive symptoms, lower severity of depressive symptoms, and older age. Worse real-life functioning was associated to lower insight in cognitive deficit, worse neurocognitive performance, and worse functional capacity. Our findings indicate that the CAI is a valid co-primary measure with the interview to patients providing a reliable assessment of their cognitive deficits. In the absence of informants with good knowledge of the subject, the interview to the patient may represent a valid alternative.

Bucci, P., Mucci, A., Giordano, G.m., Caporusso, E., Giuliani, L., Gibertoni, D., et al. (2023). Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE [10.1007/s00406-023-01641-7].

Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia

Rossi R.;Siracusano A.;Di Lorenzo G.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). The present study aimed at assessing, in a large sample of SCZ (n = 601), the agreement between patients and their informants on CAI ratings, to explore patients' insight in their cognitive deficits and its relationships with clinical and functional indices. Agreement between patient- and informant-based ratings was assessed by the Gwet's agreement coefficient. Predictors of insight in cognitive deficits were explored by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Patients reported lower severity of cognitive impairment vs. informants. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between patients' and informants' ratings. Lower insight in cognitive deficits was associated to greater severity of neurocognitive impairment and positive symptoms, lower severity of depressive symptoms, and older age. Worse real-life functioning was associated to lower insight in cognitive deficit, worse neurocognitive performance, and worse functional capacity. Our findings indicate that the CAI is a valid co-primary measure with the interview to patients providing a reliable assessment of their cognitive deficits. In the absence of informants with good knowledge of the subject, the interview to the patient may represent a valid alternative.
2023
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/25
Settore M-PSI/08
English
Co-primary measure
Cognitive impairment
Functioning
Insight
Schizophrenia
Bucci, P., Mucci, A., Giordano, G.m., Caporusso, E., Giuliani, L., Gibertoni, D., et al. (2023). Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE [10.1007/s00406-023-01641-7].
Bucci, P; Mucci, A; Giordano, Gm; Caporusso, E; Giuliani, L; Gibertoni, D; Rossi, A; Rocca, P; Bertolino, A; Galderisi, S; Piegari, G; Merlotti, E; Brando, F; Papalino, M; Calia, V; Romano, R; Barlati, S; Deste, G; Valsecchi, P; Pinna, F; Lai, A; Lostia Di Santa Sofia, S; Signorelli, Ms; Poli, Lf; Surace, T; Martinotti, G; Montemitro, C; Fatricelli, S; Altamura, M; Angelini, E; Elia, A; Calcagno, P; Belvederi Murri, M; Cattedra, S; Pacitti, F; Rossi, R; Socci, V; Giusti, L; Salza, A; Mammarella, S; de Bartolomeis, A; Favaro, A; Collantoni, E; Meneguzzo, P; Tonna, M; Ossola, P; Gerra, Ml; Gramaglia, C; Binda, V; Gambaro, E; Carmassi, C; Carpita, B; Cremone, Im; Corrivetti, G; Cascino, G; Del Buono, G; Brugnoli, R; Comparelli, A; Corigliano, V; Buzzanca, A; Gerardi, N; Frascarelli, M; Fagiolini, A; Goracci, A; Bolognesi, S; Siracusano, A; Di Lorenzo, G; Ribolsi, M; Montemagni, C; Riccardi, C; Del Favero, E
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/338385
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact