Background: Among the many interesting aspects of clinical care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, vascular access still deserves some attention. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters (MCs) are venous access devices inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture of veins of the arm, which have been associated with the possibility of minimizing infectious complications in different populations of patients. We have investigated their performance in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Methods: As the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 is still unclear, we have designed a single-center, prospective observational study enrolling all patients with established diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to our hospital in the period between October 2020 and April 2021 and who required either a PICC or a MC. Results: We recruited 227 patients. The cumulative incidence of CRBSI was 4.35% (10 cases), that is, 3.5 episodes/1,000 catheter days. Four CRBSI occurred in patients with PICCs (4.5/1,000 catheter days) and 6 in those with MCs (3.2/1,000 catheter days). Conclusions: Our data suggest that COVID-19 patients may have a more pronounced tendency for the development of catheter-related infections compared to other populations of patients.

Frondizi, F., Dolcetti, L., Pittiruti, M., Calabrese, M., Fantoni, M., Biasucci, D.g., et al. (2023). Complications associated with the use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters in COVID-19 patients: An observational prospective study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL [10.1016/j.ajic.2023.05.002].

Complications associated with the use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters in COVID-19 patients: An observational prospective study

Biasucci, Daniele Guerino
Formal Analysis
;
2023-05-07

Abstract

Background: Among the many interesting aspects of clinical care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, vascular access still deserves some attention. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters (MCs) are venous access devices inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture of veins of the arm, which have been associated with the possibility of minimizing infectious complications in different populations of patients. We have investigated their performance in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Methods: As the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 is still unclear, we have designed a single-center, prospective observational study enrolling all patients with established diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to our hospital in the period between October 2020 and April 2021 and who required either a PICC or a MC. Results: We recruited 227 patients. The cumulative incidence of CRBSI was 4.35% (10 cases), that is, 3.5 episodes/1,000 catheter days. Four CRBSI occurred in patients with PICCs (4.5/1,000 catheter days) and 6 in those with MCs (3.2/1,000 catheter days). Conclusions: Our data suggest that COVID-19 patients may have a more pronounced tendency for the development of catheter-related infections compared to other populations of patients.
7-mag-2023
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/41 - ANESTESIOLOGIA
English
COVID-19
Catheter-related bloodstream infections
Venous access devices
Frondizi, F., Dolcetti, L., Pittiruti, M., Calabrese, M., Fantoni, M., Biasucci, D.g., et al. (2023). Complications associated with the use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters in COVID-19 patients: An observational prospective study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL [10.1016/j.ajic.2023.05.002].
Frondizi, F; Dolcetti, L; Pittiruti, M; Calabrese, M; Fantoni, M; Biasucci, Dg; Scoppettuolo, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/332086
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact