The increasing knowledge of molecular genetics of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) urged the update of previous diagnostic and prognostic schemes, which resulted in the development, in 2022, of the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the new European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations. We aimed to provide a real-world application of the new models, to unravel differences and similarities, and to test their implementation in clinical AML diagnosis. A total of 1001 patients diagnosed with AML were re-classified according to the new schemes. The overall diagnostic changes between the WHO 2016, compared to WHO 2022 and ICC classifications were 22.8% and 23.7%, respectively, with a 13.1% difference in patients' distribution between ICC and WHO 2022. The 2022 ICC "not otherwise specified" and WHO "defined by differentiation" AML categories shrank as compared to WHO 2016 (24.1% and 26.8% respectively, vs 38.7%), particularly due to an expansion of the myelodysplasia (MDS)-related group. Of 397 patients with a MDS-related AML according to the ICC, 55.9% were defined by the presence of a MDS-related karyotype. The overall re-stratification between ELN 2017 and 2022 was 12.9%. The 2022 AML classifications led to a significant improvement of diagnostic schemes. In the real-world setting, conventional cytogenetics, usually rapidly available and less expensive than molecular characterization, stratified 56% of secondary AML, still maintaining a powerful diagnostic role. Considering the similarities between WHO and ICC diagnostic schemes, a tentative to generate a unified model is desirable.

Attardi, E., Savi, A., Borsellino, B., Piciocchi, A., Cipriani, M., Ottone, T., et al. (2023). Applicability of 2022 classifications of acute myeloid leukemia in the real-world setting. BLOOD ADVANCES, 7(17), 5122-5131 [10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010173].

Applicability of 2022 classifications of acute myeloid leukemia in the real-world setting

Ottone, Tiziana;Venditti, Adriano;Gurnari, Carmelo;Voso, Maria Teresa Teresa
2023-06-16

Abstract

The increasing knowledge of molecular genetics of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) urged the update of previous diagnostic and prognostic schemes, which resulted in the development, in 2022, of the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the new European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations. We aimed to provide a real-world application of the new models, to unravel differences and similarities, and to test their implementation in clinical AML diagnosis. A total of 1001 patients diagnosed with AML were re-classified according to the new schemes. The overall diagnostic changes between the WHO 2016, compared to WHO 2022 and ICC classifications were 22.8% and 23.7%, respectively, with a 13.1% difference in patients' distribution between ICC and WHO 2022. The 2022 ICC "not otherwise specified" and WHO "defined by differentiation" AML categories shrank as compared to WHO 2016 (24.1% and 26.8% respectively, vs 38.7%), particularly due to an expansion of the myelodysplasia (MDS)-related group. Of 397 patients with a MDS-related AML according to the ICC, 55.9% were defined by the presence of a MDS-related karyotype. The overall re-stratification between ELN 2017 and 2022 was 12.9%. The 2022 AML classifications led to a significant improvement of diagnostic schemes. In the real-world setting, conventional cytogenetics, usually rapidly available and less expensive than molecular characterization, stratified 56% of secondary AML, still maintaining a powerful diagnostic role. Considering the similarities between WHO and ICC diagnostic schemes, a tentative to generate a unified model is desirable.
16-giu-2023
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE
Settore MEDS-09/B - Malattie del sangue
English
Attardi, E., Savi, A., Borsellino, B., Piciocchi, A., Cipriani, M., Ottone, T., et al. (2023). Applicability of 2022 classifications of acute myeloid leukemia in the real-world setting. BLOOD ADVANCES, 7(17), 5122-5131 [10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010173].
Attardi, E; Savi, A; Borsellino, B; Piciocchi, A; Cipriani, M; Ottone, T; Fabiani, E; Divona, M; Travaglini, S; Pascale, Mr; Awada, H; Durmaz, A; Visc...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bloodadvances.2023010173.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 710 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
710 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/327264
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact