Functional Outcomes and Shoulder Instability in Reconstruction of Proximal Humerus Metastases

(1) background: some of the goals of orthopedic surgical oncology are saving limbs and function. the humerus is the third most frequent site in primary tumors and one of the most involved sites for metastases. prosthetic replacement with modular megaprosthesis is one of the treatment choices, but there are several types of complications, such as problems with function and pain. the aim of our study is to assess functional outcomes and shoulder instability in the reconstruction of proximal humerus metastases. (2) methods: this is a retrospective observational study. twenty-eight patients, with proximal humerus metastases, admitted to the department of orthopaedics and traumatology of our university hospital between 2014 and 2022 were recruited. each patient underwent resection and prosthetic replacement surgery with modular megaprosthesis. clinical evaluation was assessed through MSTS score, WOSI index, and DASH score. (3) results: twenty patients were included in the study. fairly good results, especially regarding pain, function, and emotional acceptance, were obtained in all three tests: DASH, MSTS, and WOSI. patients who reported shoulder instability actually have worse outcomes than those who report having stable shoulders. In addition, patients with a resection >10 cm have worse outcomes than those who had a resection of 10 cm. no significant differences were found between the deltopectoral approach group and the lateral approach group. (4) conclusions: reconstructive surgery with megaprosthesis of the proximal humerus in patients with metastases can be considered a treatment option, especially in patients with pathological fractures or injuries with a high risk of fracture and good life expectancy. this study shows how this type of surgery affects instability, but in terms of functionality, pain, and patient satisfaction, it gives satisfactory results.