Introduction: Age has historically been considered the main criterion to determine eligibility for intensive chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but age alone can no longer be considered an absolute indicator in determining which patients should be defined as unfit. Assessment of fitness for a given treatment today serves an important role in tailoring therapeutic options. Areas covered: This review examines the main options used in real-life to define eligibility for intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML, with a main focus on the Italian SIE/SIES/GITMO Consensus Criteria. Other published real-life experiences are also reviewed, analyzing the correlation between these criteria and short-term mortality, and thus expected outcomes. Expert opinion: Assessment of fitness is mandatory at diagnosis to tailor treatment to the greatest degree possible, evaluating the patient's individual profile. This is especially relevant when considering the availability of newer, less toxic therapeutic regimens, which have shown promising results in patients with AML who are older or considered unfit for intensive treatment. Fitness assessment is now a fundamental part of AML management and a critical step that can potentially influence outcomes and not just predict them.

Venditti, A., Cairoli, R., Caira, M., Finsinger, P., Finocchiaro, F., Neri, B., et al. (2023). Assessing eligibility for treatment in acute myeloid leukemia in 2023. EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 1-10 [10.1080/17474086.2023.2185603].

Assessing eligibility for treatment in acute myeloid leukemia in 2023

Venditti, Adriano;Neri, Benedetta;
2023-03-06

Abstract

Introduction: Age has historically been considered the main criterion to determine eligibility for intensive chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but age alone can no longer be considered an absolute indicator in determining which patients should be defined as unfit. Assessment of fitness for a given treatment today serves an important role in tailoring therapeutic options. Areas covered: This review examines the main options used in real-life to define eligibility for intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML, with a main focus on the Italian SIE/SIES/GITMO Consensus Criteria. Other published real-life experiences are also reviewed, analyzing the correlation between these criteria and short-term mortality, and thus expected outcomes. Expert opinion: Assessment of fitness is mandatory at diagnosis to tailor treatment to the greatest degree possible, evaluating the patient's individual profile. This is especially relevant when considering the availability of newer, less toxic therapeutic regimens, which have shown promising results in patients with AML who are older or considered unfit for intensive treatment. Fitness assessment is now a fundamental part of AML management and a critical step that can potentially influence outcomes and not just predict them.
6-mar-2023
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE
English
acute myeloid leukemia
comorbidities
elderly
fitness
geriatric scores
intensive chemotherapy
performance status
https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2023.2185603
Venditti, A., Cairoli, R., Caira, M., Finsinger, P., Finocchiaro, F., Neri, B., et al. (2023). Assessing eligibility for treatment in acute myeloid leukemia in 2023. EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 1-10 [10.1080/17474086.2023.2185603].
Venditti, A; Cairoli, R; Caira, M; Finsinger, P; Finocchiaro, F; Neri, B; Debenedittis, D; Rossi, G; Ferrara, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Assessing eligibility for treatment in acute myeloid leukemia in 2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 764.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
764.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/317417
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact