We study opinion dynamics in multi-agent networks when a bias toward one of two pos-sible opinions exists, for example reflecting a status quo versus a superior alternative. Our aim is to investigate the combined effect of bias, network structure, and opinion dynamics on the convergence of the system of agents as a whole. Models of such evolving processes can easily become analytically intractable. In this paper, we consider a simple yet mathe-matically rich setting, in which all agents initially share an initial opinion representing the status quo. The system evolves in steps. In each step, one agent selected uniformly at ran -dom follows an underlying update rule to revise its opinion on the basis of those held by its neighbors, but with a probabilistic bias towards the superior alternative. We analyze con-vergence of the resulting process under well-known update rules. The framework we pro -pose is simple and modular, but at the same time complex enough to highlight a nonobvious interplay between topology and underlying update rule.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Anagnostopoulos, A., Becchetti, L., Cruciani, E., Pasquale, F., Rizzo, S. (2022). Biased Opinion Dynamics: When the Devil Is in the Details. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 593, 49-63 [10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.072].

Biased Opinion Dynamics: When the Devil Is in the Details

Francesco Pasquale;
2022-01-01

Abstract

We study opinion dynamics in multi-agent networks when a bias toward one of two pos-sible opinions exists, for example reflecting a status quo versus a superior alternative. Our aim is to investigate the combined effect of bias, network structure, and opinion dynamics on the convergence of the system of agents as a whole. Models of such evolving processes can easily become analytically intractable. In this paper, we consider a simple yet mathe-matically rich setting, in which all agents initially share an initial opinion representing the status quo. The system evolves in steps. In each step, one agent selected uniformly at ran -dom follows an underlying update rule to revise its opinion on the basis of those held by its neighbors, but with a probabilistic bias towards the superior alternative. We analyze con-vergence of the resulting process under well-known update rules. The framework we pro -pose is simple and modular, but at the same time complex enough to highlight a nonobvious interplay between topology and underlying update rule.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore INF/01 - INFORMATICA
English
Opinion dynamics
Majority dynamics
Voter model
Social networks
Consensus
Markov chains
Anagnostopoulos, A., Becchetti, L., Cruciani, E., Pasquale, F., Rizzo, S. (2022). Biased Opinion Dynamics: When the Devil Is in the Details. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 593, 49-63 [10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.072].
Anagnostopoulos, A; Becchetti, L; Cruciani, E; Pasquale, F; Rizzo, S
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0020025522001116-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 986.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
986.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/316188
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact