We study opinion dynamics in multi-agent networks when a bias toward one of two pos-sible opinions exists, for example reflecting a status quo versus a superior alternative. Our aim is to investigate the combined effect of bias, network structure, and opinion dynamics on the convergence of the system of agents as a whole. Models of such evolving processes can easily become analytically intractable. In this paper, we consider a simple yet mathe-matically rich setting, in which all agents initially share an initial opinion representing the status quo. The system evolves in steps. In each step, one agent selected uniformly at ran -dom follows an underlying update rule to revise its opinion on the basis of those held by its neighbors, but with a probabilistic bias towards the superior alternative. We analyze con-vergence of the resulting process under well-known update rules. The framework we pro -pose is simple and modular, but at the same time complex enough to highlight a nonobvious interplay between topology and underlying update rule.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Anagnostopoulos, A., Becchetti, L., Cruciani, E., Pasquale, F., Rizzo, S. (2022). Biased Opinion Dynamics: When the Devil Is in the Details. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 593, 49-63 [10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.072].
Biased Opinion Dynamics: When the Devil Is in the Details
Francesco Pasquale;
2022-01-01
Abstract
We study opinion dynamics in multi-agent networks when a bias toward one of two pos-sible opinions exists, for example reflecting a status quo versus a superior alternative. Our aim is to investigate the combined effect of bias, network structure, and opinion dynamics on the convergence of the system of agents as a whole. Models of such evolving processes can easily become analytically intractable. In this paper, we consider a simple yet mathe-matically rich setting, in which all agents initially share an initial opinion representing the status quo. The system evolves in steps. In each step, one agent selected uniformly at ran -dom follows an underlying update rule to revise its opinion on the basis of those held by its neighbors, but with a probabilistic bias towards the superior alternative. We analyze con-vergence of the resulting process under well-known update rules. The framework we pro -pose is simple and modular, but at the same time complex enough to highlight a nonobvious interplay between topology and underlying update rule.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0020025522001116-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
986.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
986.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.