The present study focused on demographic and personality differences in the use of 30 defense mechanisms in adolescents with personality psychopathology and explored the hierarchical organization of personality traits based on the adaptiveness of defensive functioning. A total of 102 self-referred adolescent outpatients were interviewed and assessed on defense mechanisms and personality traits using the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales and the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure 200 for Adolescents, respectively. Age and gender differences were found throughout the hierarchy. Pearson's correlations revealed a hierarchical organization of emerging personality disorders (PDs) in adolescence. More adaptive defenses were clearly associated with healthier personality style, whereas more pathological personality styles such as those with borderline traits were characterized by more rigid and maladaptive defenses. Dissociation was also associated with maladaptive personality types. Identifying the defenses associated with emerging personality disorders may inform the unconscious function of defense mechanisms in specific PDs. The systematic assessment of defense mechanisms might also help therapists to monitor changes during treatment.

Di Giuseppe, M., Perry, J.c., Conversano, C., Gelo, O., Gennaro, A. (2020). Defense Mechanisms, Gender, and Adaptiveness in Emerging Personality Disorders in Adolescent Outpatients. THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 208(12), 933-941 [10.1097/NMD.0000000000001230].

Defense Mechanisms, Gender, and Adaptiveness in Emerging Personality Disorders in Adolescent Outpatients

Di Giuseppe M.
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

The present study focused on demographic and personality differences in the use of 30 defense mechanisms in adolescents with personality psychopathology and explored the hierarchical organization of personality traits based on the adaptiveness of defensive functioning. A total of 102 self-referred adolescent outpatients were interviewed and assessed on defense mechanisms and personality traits using the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales and the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure 200 for Adolescents, respectively. Age and gender differences were found throughout the hierarchy. Pearson's correlations revealed a hierarchical organization of emerging personality disorders (PDs) in adolescence. More adaptive defenses were clearly associated with healthier personality style, whereas more pathological personality styles such as those with borderline traits were characterized by more rigid and maladaptive defenses. Dissociation was also associated with maladaptive personality types. Identifying the defenses associated with emerging personality disorders may inform the unconscious function of defense mechanisms in specific PDs. The systematic assessment of defense mechanisms might also help therapists to monitor changes during treatment.
2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-PSI/08 - PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
Settore M-PSI/07 - PSICOLOGIA DINAMICA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Dissociation
Defense mechanisms
Adolescence
Personality Disorder
Adaptation
Di Giuseppe, M., Perry, J.c., Conversano, C., Gelo, O., Gennaro, A. (2020). Defense Mechanisms, Gender, and Adaptiveness in Emerging Personality Disorders in Adolescent Outpatients. THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 208(12), 933-941 [10.1097/NMD.0000000000001230].
Di Giuseppe, M; Perry, Jc; Conversano, C; Gelo, Ocg; Gennaro, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Defense_Mechanisms,_Gender,_and_Adaptiveness_in.5.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 259.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
259.94 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/313726
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact