Objective the advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems have provided the potential to ameliorate glucose control in children with type 1 diabetes. The aim of the present work was to compare metabolic control obtained with 2 AHCL systems (Medtronic 780G system and tandem control IQ system) in a pediatric real-life clinical context. Research design and methods It is an observational, real-life, monocentric study; thirty one children and adolescents (M:F = 15:16, age range 7.6-18 years, mean age 13.05 +/- 2.4 years, diabetes duration > 1 year) with T1D, previously treated with predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) systems and then upgraded to AHCL have been enrolled. CGM data of the last four weeks of "PLGS system" (PRE period) with the first four weeks of AHCL system (POST period) have been compared. Results For both AHCL systems, Medtronic 780G and Tandem Control IQ, respectively TIR at 4 weeks significantly increased, from 65.7 to 70.5% (p < 0.01) and from 64.8 to 70.1% (p < 0.01). (p < 0.01). The comparison between CGM metrics of the 2 evaluated systems doesn't show difference at baseline (last four weeks of PLGS system) and after four weeks of AHCL use. Conclusions To our knowledge, this study is the first real-life one comparing 2 AHCL systems in a pediatric population with T1D. It shows an improvement in glucose control when upgrading to AHCL. The comparison between the two AHCL systems did not show significant differences in the analyzed CGM metrics, meaning that the algorithms currently available are equally effective in promoting glucose control.

Schiaffini, R., Deodati, A., Nicoletti, M.c., Carducci, C., Ciampalini, P., Lorubbio, A., et al. (2022). Comparison of two advanced hybrid closed loop in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: a real-life observational study. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 59(7), 959-964 [10.1007/s00592-022-01886-z].

Comparison of two advanced hybrid closed loop in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: a real-life observational study

Deodati, A;Pampanini, V;Rapini, N;Cianfarani, S
2022-07-01

Abstract

Objective the advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems have provided the potential to ameliorate glucose control in children with type 1 diabetes. The aim of the present work was to compare metabolic control obtained with 2 AHCL systems (Medtronic 780G system and tandem control IQ system) in a pediatric real-life clinical context. Research design and methods It is an observational, real-life, monocentric study; thirty one children and adolescents (M:F = 15:16, age range 7.6-18 years, mean age 13.05 +/- 2.4 years, diabetes duration > 1 year) with T1D, previously treated with predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) systems and then upgraded to AHCL have been enrolled. CGM data of the last four weeks of "PLGS system" (PRE period) with the first four weeks of AHCL system (POST period) have been compared. Results For both AHCL systems, Medtronic 780G and Tandem Control IQ, respectively TIR at 4 weeks significantly increased, from 65.7 to 70.5% (p < 0.01) and from 64.8 to 70.1% (p < 0.01). (p < 0.01). The comparison between CGM metrics of the 2 evaluated systems doesn't show difference at baseline (last four weeks of PLGS system) and after four weeks of AHCL use. Conclusions To our knowledge, this study is the first real-life one comparing 2 AHCL systems in a pediatric population with T1D. It shows an improvement in glucose control when upgrading to AHCL. The comparison between the two AHCL systems did not show significant differences in the analyzed CGM metrics, meaning that the algorithms currently available are equally effective in promoting glucose control.
lug-2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/38 - PEDIATRIA GENERALE E SPECIALISTICA
English
Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop
Diabetes
Pediatric
Type 1 diabetes
Schiaffini, R., Deodati, A., Nicoletti, M.c., Carducci, C., Ciampalini, P., Lorubbio, A., et al. (2022). Comparison of two advanced hybrid closed loop in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: a real-life observational study. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 59(7), 959-964 [10.1007/s00592-022-01886-z].
Schiaffini, R; Deodati, A; Nicoletti, Mc; Carducci, C; Ciampalini, P; Lorubbio, A; Matteoli, Mc; Pampanini, V; Patera, Ip; Rapini, N; Cianfarani, S...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ACTAs00592-022-01886-z.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 644.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
644.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/313614
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact