The present work examines the effects of external and internal morphological features on the dynamic elastic modulus and its measure. It consists of two parts. The first part considers the effect of geometrical features of probes and shows the key role of roughness as source of a systematic error leading to the underestimation of the Young’s modulus. The second one is focused on the effect of porosity. Several models which consider the porosity as an ideal regular microstructure and the relative equations describing the Young’s modulus vs. porosity have been reviewed and critically discussed. The values of the relative modulus Er predicted by different models are similar for materials with low porosity (p < 0.2) and isolated pores whereas they strongly diverge if p > 0.2 and interconnected pores are present. Moreover, such models fail to describe the elastic behavior of materials correctly also with low porosity (p ≈ 0.1) such as sintered steels in the case of pores with a preferred orientation and an irregular shape.
Richetta, M., Varone, A. (2021). A focus on dynamic modulus: Effects of external and internal morphological features. METALS, 11(1), 1-16 [10.3390/met11010040].
A focus on dynamic modulus: Effects of external and internal morphological features
Richetta M.;Varone A.
2021-01-01
Abstract
The present work examines the effects of external and internal morphological features on the dynamic elastic modulus and its measure. It consists of two parts. The first part considers the effect of geometrical features of probes and shows the key role of roughness as source of a systematic error leading to the underestimation of the Young’s modulus. The second one is focused on the effect of porosity. Several models which consider the porosity as an ideal regular microstructure and the relative equations describing the Young’s modulus vs. porosity have been reviewed and critically discussed. The values of the relative modulus Er predicted by different models are similar for materials with low porosity (p < 0.2) and isolated pores whereas they strongly diverge if p > 0.2 and interconnected pores are present. Moreover, such models fail to describe the elastic behavior of materials correctly also with low porosity (p ≈ 0.1) such as sintered steels in the case of pores with a preferred orientation and an irregular shape.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
