The availability of a new 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)makes it appropriate to assess its cost-effectiveness. This was evaluated by adopting the Italian National Health Service perspective, using a cost consequences Markovian model. The expected effects of vaccination with 20-valent PCV were compared with the administration of 13-valent PCV and 15-valent PCV. Assuming a 100% vaccination of cohorts aged 65–74 years, in the (lifetime) comparison between 20-valent PCV and 13-valent PCV, the former is dominant (lower cost for a better health outcome). A reduction in disease events was estimated: 􀀀1208 deaths; 􀀀1171 cases of bacteraemia; 􀀀227 of meningitis; 􀀀9845 hospitalised all-cause nonbacteremic pneumonia cases (NBP) and 􀀀21,058 non-hospitalised. Overall, in the Italian population, a total gain of 6581.6 life years and of 4734.0 QALY was estimated. On the cost side, against an increase in vaccinations costs (EUR +40.568 million), other direct health costs are reduced by EUR 48.032 million, with a net saving of EUR +7.464 million. The comparison between 20-valent PCV and 15-valent PCV results in an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of EUR 66 per life year gained and EUR 91 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the results. We can conclude that the switch to 20-valent PCV is a sustainable and efficient investment.

Polistena, B., Icardi, G., Orsi, A., Spandonaro, F., Di Virgilio, R., D'Angela, D. (2022). Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination with the 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in the Italian Adult Population. VACCINES.

Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination with the 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in the Italian Adult Population

F. Spandonaro
;
2022-10-01

Abstract

The availability of a new 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)makes it appropriate to assess its cost-effectiveness. This was evaluated by adopting the Italian National Health Service perspective, using a cost consequences Markovian model. The expected effects of vaccination with 20-valent PCV were compared with the administration of 13-valent PCV and 15-valent PCV. Assuming a 100% vaccination of cohorts aged 65–74 years, in the (lifetime) comparison between 20-valent PCV and 13-valent PCV, the former is dominant (lower cost for a better health outcome). A reduction in disease events was estimated: 􀀀1208 deaths; 􀀀1171 cases of bacteraemia; 􀀀227 of meningitis; 􀀀9845 hospitalised all-cause nonbacteremic pneumonia cases (NBP) and 􀀀21,058 non-hospitalised. Overall, in the Italian population, a total gain of 6581.6 life years and of 4734.0 QALY was estimated. On the cost side, against an increase in vaccinations costs (EUR +40.568 million), other direct health costs are reduced by EUR 48.032 million, with a net saving of EUR +7.464 million. The comparison between 20-valent PCV and 15-valent PCV results in an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of EUR 66 per life year gained and EUR 91 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the results. We can conclude that the switch to 20-valent PCV is a sustainable and efficient investment.
ott-2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti non anonimi
Settore SECS-P/06 - ECONOMIA APPLICATA
English
vaccines; immunization; cost consequences; cost-effectiveness; cost-utilities
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines
Polistena, B., Icardi, G., Orsi, A., Spandonaro, F., Di Virgilio, R., D'Angela, D. (2022). Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination with the 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in the Italian Adult Population. VACCINES.
Polistena, B; Icardi, G; Orsi, A; Spandonaro, F; Di Virgilio, R; D'Angela, D
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
202201.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 721.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
721.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/310636
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact