Objectives: To evaluate whether continuing the antiplatelet drug acetylsalicylic acid <= 100mg (ASA) during Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) increases the risk of peri-and postoperative hemorrhagic complications and overall morbidity. Indeed, guidelines recommend interrupting antiplatelet therapy before radical cystectomy; however, RARC with ICUD is associated to reduced estimated blood loss and blood transfusions compared to its open counterpart.Methods: Data from a multicentric European database were analyzed. All participating centers maintained a prospective database of patients undergoing RARC with ICUD. We identified patients receiving antiplatelet therapy by acetylsalicylic acid <= 100mg. Patients were divided into three groups: those not taking acetylsalicylic acid (no-ASA), those where ASA was continued perioperatively (c-ASA) and those where ASA was interrupted perioperatively (i-ASA). Estimated blood loss and peri-and post-operative transfusions were recorded. Hemorrhagic complications, ischemic, thrombotic and cardiac morbidity was recorded and classified using the Clavien-Dindo score by a senior urologist.Results: 640 patients were analyzed. Patients on acetylsalicylic acid were significantly older and had more comorbidities. No significant difference was found for estimated blood loss between no-ASA, c-ASA and i-ASA (280 vs. 300 vs. 200ml respectively; P = 0.09). Similarly, no significant difference was found for intraoperative (5% vs. 9% vs. 11%; P = 0.07) and postoperative transfusion rate (11% vs. 13% vs. 18%; P = 0.17). Higher ischemic complications were noted in the i-ASA group compared to no-ASA and c-ASA (4% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.03). On uni and multivariate logistic regression, continuing acetylsalicylic acid was not significantly associated to either major complications or post-operative transfusions.Conclusions: Peri-operative acetylsalicylic acid continuation in RARC with ICUD does not increase hemorrhagic complications. Interrupting acetylsalicylic acid peri-operatively may expose patients to a higher risk of ischemic events. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Albisinni, S., Diamand, R., Mjaess, G., Assenmacher, G., Assenmacher, C., Loos, S., et al. (2022). Continuing acetylsalicylic acid during Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase hemorrhagic complications: results from a large multicentric cohort. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 40(4), 11-17 [10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.023].

Continuing acetylsalicylic acid during Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase hemorrhagic complications: results from a large multicentric cohort

Albisinni S.;Anceschi U.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether continuing the antiplatelet drug acetylsalicylic acid <= 100mg (ASA) during Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) increases the risk of peri-and postoperative hemorrhagic complications and overall morbidity. Indeed, guidelines recommend interrupting antiplatelet therapy before radical cystectomy; however, RARC with ICUD is associated to reduced estimated blood loss and blood transfusions compared to its open counterpart.Methods: Data from a multicentric European database were analyzed. All participating centers maintained a prospective database of patients undergoing RARC with ICUD. We identified patients receiving antiplatelet therapy by acetylsalicylic acid <= 100mg. Patients were divided into three groups: those not taking acetylsalicylic acid (no-ASA), those where ASA was continued perioperatively (c-ASA) and those where ASA was interrupted perioperatively (i-ASA). Estimated blood loss and peri-and post-operative transfusions were recorded. Hemorrhagic complications, ischemic, thrombotic and cardiac morbidity was recorded and classified using the Clavien-Dindo score by a senior urologist.Results: 640 patients were analyzed. Patients on acetylsalicylic acid were significantly older and had more comorbidities. No significant difference was found for estimated blood loss between no-ASA, c-ASA and i-ASA (280 vs. 300 vs. 200ml respectively; P = 0.09). Similarly, no significant difference was found for intraoperative (5% vs. 9% vs. 11%; P = 0.07) and postoperative transfusion rate (11% vs. 13% vs. 18%; P = 0.17). Higher ischemic complications were noted in the i-ASA group compared to no-ASA and c-ASA (4% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.03). On uni and multivariate logistic regression, continuing acetylsalicylic acid was not significantly associated to either major complications or post-operative transfusions.Conclusions: Peri-operative acetylsalicylic acid continuation in RARC with ICUD does not increase hemorrhagic complications. Interrupting acetylsalicylic acid peri-operatively may expose patients to a higher risk of ischemic events. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/24 - UROLOGIA
English
Albisinni, S., Diamand, R., Mjaess, G., Assenmacher, G., Assenmacher, C., Loos, S., et al. (2022). Continuing acetylsalicylic acid during Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase hemorrhagic complications: results from a large multicentric cohort. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 40(4), 11-17 [10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.023].
Albisinni, S; Diamand, R; Mjaess, G; Assenmacher, G; Assenmacher, C; Loos, S; Verhoest, G; Holz, S; Naudin, M; Ploussard, G; Mari, A; Di Maida, F; Minervini, A; Aoun, F; Tay, A; Issa, R; Roumiguie, M; Bajeot, As; Simone, G; Anceschi, U; Umari, P; Sridhar, A; Kelly, J; Hendricksen, K; Einerhand, S; Sanchez-Salas, R; Colomer, A; Quackels, T; Peltier, A; Montorsi, F; Briganti, A; Pradere, B; Moschini, M; Roumeguere, T
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/310301
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact