Context. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (AMUC). However, data comparing the efficacy of different platinum agents are limited. Objective. This review aimed to assess the efficacy of carboplatin as a first-line treatment for AMUC using phase 3 randomized trial data. Evidence acquisition. Multiple databases were searched for articles published until August 2021. Studies that compared overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), and objective response rates (ORRs) in chemotherapy-eligible patients with AMUC were deemed eligible. Evidence synthesis. Four studies were included. Compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neither cisplatin- nor carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with significant OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–1.11, p = 0.64 and HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.78–1.04, p = 0.16, respectively) and CR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.70–1.92, p = 0.57 and OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52–1.53, p = 0.67, respectively benefits, while both were associated with a favorable ORR (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40–0.74, p < 0.001 and OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42–0.80, p < 0.001, respectively). A network meta-analysis (NMA)-based indirect comparison between carboplatin and cisplatin revealed that while cisplatin was slightly better than carboplatin in terms of OS, CR, and ORR, no significant difference was noted. Conclusions. Cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapies offer similar OS/CR benefits to ICI monotherapy and elicit a greater ORR than ICI monotherapy. Moreover, our NMA demonstrated that both cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapy have a similar efficacy in terms of OS, CR, and ORR. Given that carboplatin-based chemotherapy is shown to be more effective in contemporary series than in historical controls, it is strongly recommended that carboplatin be re-examined for its value in the era of ICIs and beyond. Patient summary. Cisplatin- as well as carboplatin-based chemotherapy is as effective as immune checkpoint inhibitors in terms of survival and eliciting a positive response. It is currently believed that cisplatin provides greater benefits than carboplatin; this requires re-evaluation.

Mori, K., Schuettfort, V.m., Yanagisawa, T., Katayama, S., Pradere, B., Laukhtina, E., et al. (2022). Reassessment of the efficacy of carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the Era of immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 8(6), 1687-1695 [10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.007].

Reassessment of the efficacy of carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the Era of immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Albisinni S.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Context. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (AMUC). However, data comparing the efficacy of different platinum agents are limited. Objective. This review aimed to assess the efficacy of carboplatin as a first-line treatment for AMUC using phase 3 randomized trial data. Evidence acquisition. Multiple databases were searched for articles published until August 2021. Studies that compared overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), and objective response rates (ORRs) in chemotherapy-eligible patients with AMUC were deemed eligible. Evidence synthesis. Four studies were included. Compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neither cisplatin- nor carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with significant OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–1.11, p = 0.64 and HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.78–1.04, p = 0.16, respectively) and CR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.70–1.92, p = 0.57 and OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52–1.53, p = 0.67, respectively benefits, while both were associated with a favorable ORR (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40–0.74, p < 0.001 and OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42–0.80, p < 0.001, respectively). A network meta-analysis (NMA)-based indirect comparison between carboplatin and cisplatin revealed that while cisplatin was slightly better than carboplatin in terms of OS, CR, and ORR, no significant difference was noted. Conclusions. Cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapies offer similar OS/CR benefits to ICI monotherapy and elicit a greater ORR than ICI monotherapy. Moreover, our NMA demonstrated that both cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapy have a similar efficacy in terms of OS, CR, and ORR. Given that carboplatin-based chemotherapy is shown to be more effective in contemporary series than in historical controls, it is strongly recommended that carboplatin be re-examined for its value in the era of ICIs and beyond. Patient summary. Cisplatin- as well as carboplatin-based chemotherapy is as effective as immune checkpoint inhibitors in terms of survival and eliciting a positive response. It is currently believed that cisplatin provides greater benefits than carboplatin; this requires re-evaluation.
2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Review
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/24 - UROLOGIA
Settore MEDS-14/C - Urologia
English
Mori, K., Schuettfort, V.m., Yanagisawa, T., Katayama, S., Pradere, B., Laukhtina, E., et al. (2022). Reassessment of the efficacy of carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the Era of immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 8(6), 1687-1695 [10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.007].
Mori, K; Schuettfort, Vm; Yanagisawa, T; Katayama, S; Pradere, B; Laukhtina, E; Rajwa, P; Mostafaei, H; Sari Motlagh, R; Quhal, F; Moschini, M; Soria,...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/310260
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact