INTRODUCTION: Retzius-sparing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is a novel surgical approach to radical prostatectomy. Its pioneers have suggested an improved recovery of urinary continence, while maintaining adequate cancer control. The aim of this systematic review was to explore available data on RS-RALP and compare functional, oncologic, and perioperative results of RS-RARP compared to anterior RARP.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search following PRISMA guidelines was performed including the combination of the following words: "Retzius" AND "sparing" AND "radical" AND "prostatectomy." Ninety-three articles were identified and 13 were included in the systematic review, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All available randomized trials confirmed an improved immediate continence for RS-RARP, with rates ranging 51-71%, compared to 21-48% for anterior RARP. However, this advantage was progressively lost with no significant difference found after 6 months. Moreover, a prospective study found no discrepancy in terms of quality of life across the two techniques. Erectile function was difficult to compare, as patients had different baseline erectile function across studies and rate of neurovascular preservation was not comparable. Surgical approach remains controversial regarding positive margin rate, although related to the surgeon's experience and clinical stage. Biochemical recurrencefree survival appears similar between the two approaches.CONCLUSIONS: RS-RARP improves early urinary continence recovery compared to anterior RARP, with this advantage being lost after 3 to 6 months. Erectile function and quality of life were however comparable between the two techniques. The results concerning the rate of positive margins remained controversial. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to better assess oncologic outcomes.

Albisinni, S., Dasnoy, C., Diamand, R., Mjaess, G., Aoun, F., Esperto, F., et al. (2022). Anterior vs. retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?. MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 74(22), 137-145 [10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04623-1].

Anterior vs. retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?

Albisinni S.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Retzius-sparing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is a novel surgical approach to radical prostatectomy. Its pioneers have suggested an improved recovery of urinary continence, while maintaining adequate cancer control. The aim of this systematic review was to explore available data on RS-RALP and compare functional, oncologic, and perioperative results of RS-RARP compared to anterior RARP.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search following PRISMA guidelines was performed including the combination of the following words: "Retzius" AND "sparing" AND "radical" AND "prostatectomy." Ninety-three articles were identified and 13 were included in the systematic review, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All available randomized trials confirmed an improved immediate continence for RS-RARP, with rates ranging 51-71%, compared to 21-48% for anterior RARP. However, this advantage was progressively lost with no significant difference found after 6 months. Moreover, a prospective study found no discrepancy in terms of quality of life across the two techniques. Erectile function was difficult to compare, as patients had different baseline erectile function across studies and rate of neurovascular preservation was not comparable. Surgical approach remains controversial regarding positive margin rate, although related to the surgeon's experience and clinical stage. Biochemical recurrencefree survival appears similar between the two approaches.CONCLUSIONS: RS-RARP improves early urinary continence recovery compared to anterior RARP, with this advantage being lost after 3 to 6 months. Erectile function and quality of life were however comparable between the two techniques. The results concerning the rate of positive margins remained controversial. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to better assess oncologic outcomes.
2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Recensione
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/24 - UROLOGIA
English
Prostate neoplasms
Prostatectomy
Robotics
Albisinni, S., Dasnoy, C., Diamand, R., Mjaess, G., Aoun, F., Esperto, F., et al. (2022). Anterior vs. retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?. MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 74(22), 137-145 [10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04623-1].
Albisinni, S; Dasnoy, C; Diamand, R; Mjaess, G; Aoun, F; Esperto, F; Porpiglia, F; Fiori, C; Roumeguere, T; de Nunzio, C
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/310098
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact