We carried out an fMRI study with a twofold purpose: to investigate the relationship between networks dedicated to semantic and visual processing and to address the issue of whether semantic memory is subserved by a unique network or by different subsystems, according to semantic category or feature type. To achieve our goals, we administered a word-picture matching task, with within-category foils, to 15 healthy subjects during scanning. Semantic distance between the target and the foil and semantic domain of the target-foil pairs were varied orthogonally. Our results suggest that an amodal, undifferentiated network for the semantic processing of living things and artifacts is located in the anterolateral aspects of the temporal lobes; in fact, activity in this substrate was driven by semantic distance, not by semantic category. By contrast, activity in ventral occipito-temporal cortex was driven by category, not by semantic distance. We interpret the latter finding as the effect exerted by systematic differences between living things and artifacts at the level of their structural representations and possibly of their lower-level visual features. Finally, we attempt to reconcile contrasting data in the neuropsychological and functional imaging literature on semantic substrate and category specificity.

Zannino, G., Buccione, I., Perri, R., Macaluso, E., Lo Gerfo, E., Caltagirone, C., et al. (2010). Visual and semantic processing of living things and artifacts: an FMRI study. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 22(3), 554-570 [10.1162/jocn.2009.21197].

Visual and semantic processing of living things and artifacts: an FMRI study

CALTAGIRONE, CARLO;CARLESIMO, GIOVANNI
2010-03-01

Abstract

We carried out an fMRI study with a twofold purpose: to investigate the relationship between networks dedicated to semantic and visual processing and to address the issue of whether semantic memory is subserved by a unique network or by different subsystems, according to semantic category or feature type. To achieve our goals, we administered a word-picture matching task, with within-category foils, to 15 healthy subjects during scanning. Semantic distance between the target and the foil and semantic domain of the target-foil pairs were varied orthogonally. Our results suggest that an amodal, undifferentiated network for the semantic processing of living things and artifacts is located in the anterolateral aspects of the temporal lobes; in fact, activity in this substrate was driven by semantic distance, not by semantic category. By contrast, activity in ventral occipito-temporal cortex was driven by category, not by semantic distance. We interpret the latter finding as the effect exerted by systematic differences between living things and artifacts at the level of their structural representations and possibly of their lower-level visual features. Finally, we attempt to reconcile contrasting data in the neuropsychological and functional imaging literature on semantic substrate and category specificity.
mar-2010
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/26 - NEUROLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Young Adult; Humans; Cognition; Semantics; Neuropsychology; Brain Mapping; Adult; Temporal Lobe; Female; Male; Visual Perception; Occipital Lobe
Zannino, G., Buccione, I., Perri, R., Macaluso, E., Lo Gerfo, E., Caltagirone, C., et al. (2010). Visual and semantic processing of living things and artifacts: an FMRI study. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 22(3), 554-570 [10.1162/jocn.2009.21197].
Zannino, G; Buccione, I; Perri, R; Macaluso, E; Lo Gerfo, E; Caltagirone, C; Carlesimo, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/30956
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact