The use of sedation is required for the majority of mechanically ventilated patients in order to ensure comfort. For many years, deep sedation was the standard of care to avoid unpleasant memories and anxiety and provide comfort. Research over the past decade has shown the importance of using different tools to assess the level of sedation in order to guide appropriate dosing of sedative and to measure the clinical response to sedation. Given the progress in recent trials in this area, the management of sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) can be improved using various approaches that have shown improved outcomes in the ICU. The most prominent of these interventions involves linking daily interruptions in sedation (i.e., spontaneous awakening trials, SATs) with ventilator weaning protocols that incorporate spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Intensivists should combine the goals of ensuring patient comfort and avoiding unpleasant memories with other important goals that can be achieved with these new strategies (i.e. SATs plus SBTs or the so-called "wake up and breather approach"), such as a three day reduction in time spent on the ventiilator, a four day reduction in ICU and hospital stays and a 14% absolute reduction in death at one year. New choices for sedation, such as alpha-2 agonists and ultra short narcotics, are also being actively investigated, which may lead to complementary improvements in the future management of these critically ill, vulnerable patients.

Morandi, A., Watson, P., Trabucchi, M.m., Ely, E. (2009). Advances in sedation for critically ill patients. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 75(6), 385-391.

Advances in sedation for critically ill patients

TRABUCCHI, MARCO MARIO;
2009-01-01

Abstract

The use of sedation is required for the majority of mechanically ventilated patients in order to ensure comfort. For many years, deep sedation was the standard of care to avoid unpleasant memories and anxiety and provide comfort. Research over the past decade has shown the importance of using different tools to assess the level of sedation in order to guide appropriate dosing of sedative and to measure the clinical response to sedation. Given the progress in recent trials in this area, the management of sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) can be improved using various approaches that have shown improved outcomes in the ICU. The most prominent of these interventions involves linking daily interruptions in sedation (i.e., spontaneous awakening trials, SATs) with ventilator weaning protocols that incorporate spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Intensivists should combine the goals of ensuring patient comfort and avoiding unpleasant memories with other important goals that can be achieved with these new strategies (i.e. SATs plus SBTs or the so-called "wake up and breather approach"), such as a three day reduction in time spent on the ventiilator, a four day reduction in ICU and hospital stays and a 14% absolute reduction in death at one year. New choices for sedation, such as alpha-2 agonists and ultra short narcotics, are also being actively investigated, which may lead to complementary improvements in the future management of these critically ill, vulnerable patients.
2009
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore BIO/14 - FARMACOLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Conscious sedation; Intensive care unit; Delirium; Aging; Benzodiazepines; Dexmedetomidine; Propofol
PMID: 18636058
Morandi, A., Watson, P., Trabucchi, M.m., Ely, E. (2009). Advances in sedation for critically ill patients. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 75(6), 385-391.
Morandi, A; Watson, P; Trabucchi, Mm; Ely, E
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/30722
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact